Literature DB >> 9663036

Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure.

M R Norton1.   

Abstract

The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture-abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow-up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663036     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

1.  A focus on soft tissue in dental implantology.

Authors:  B S Talwar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-15

2.  Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs.

Authors:  M M Goswami
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Use of separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study for up to 1 year.

Authors:  Min-Jung Kwon; In-Sung Yeo; Young-Kyun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Procedure: Augmentation of Bone around Dental Implants without Grafts-A Review of a Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Christopher Riben; Andreas Thor
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-18

5.  2D FEA of evaluation of micromovements and stresses at bone-implant interface in immediately loaded tapered implants in the posterior maxilla.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; Rika Singh; I Karthikeyan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-09

6.  Marginal Bone Level Evaluation after Functional Loading Around Two Different Dental Implant Designs.

Authors:  Ko-Ning Ho; Eisner Salamanca; Hsi-Kuai Lin; Sheng-Yang Lee; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The effect of microthread design on magnitude and distribution of stresses in bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shima Golmohammadi; Amir Eskandari; Mohammad Reza Movahhedy; Adileh Shirmohammadi; Reza Amid
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

8.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Riyam Kassem; Amar Samara; Ameer Biadsee; Shchada Masarwa; Tarek Mtanis; Zeev Ormianer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.748

9.  Comparison between Early Loaded Single Implants with Internal Conical Connection or Implants with Transmucosal Neck Design: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Clinical, Aesthetics, and Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  Francesco Mattia Ceruso; Irene Ieria; Marco Tallarico; Silvio Mario Meloni; Aurea Immacolata Lumbau; Alessandro Mastroianni; Alessio Zotti; Marco Gargari
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.