Literature DB >> 27408284

Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs.

M M Goswami1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Crestal bone loss along the dental implant surface deranges its prognosis and is known to occur with implants having 02 mm smooth crest module/collar design. Implants with rough coated crest module/collar design are said to reduce crestal bone loss. Comparison of crestal bone loss with both crest module/collar designs of implants needs to be done.
METHODS: Twenty cases were selected. Each case received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with coated rough collar design (Group-B). All the 40 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of six months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal and lingual side of each implant using maxillofacial computed tomography at six, twelve and eighteen months time interval after placing the implants. Soft tissue evaluation was carried out around each implant using Gingival, Plaque and Calculus Indices, six and twelve months after loading the implants. RESULT: After 18 months i.e. one year after loading the implants, Group-A implants showed an overall average crestal bone loss of 1.53 mm and Group-B implants showed average bone loss of 1.42 mm, the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.05). For both types of implants, average crestal bone loss was maximum on the buccal side, followed by mesial, lingual and distal sides. Soft tissue evaluation revealed that the tissues remained healthy till the end of study for both types of implants.
CONCLUSION: Crestal bone loss was less among implants with rough collar design as compared to smooth collar design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crest module design; Crestal bone loss; Implant

Year:  2011        PMID: 27408284      PMCID: PMC4921389          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80091-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  7 in total

Review 1.  Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone.

Authors:  H W Wiskott; U C Belser
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  H Vaillancourt; R M Pilliar; D McCammond
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Dental implant design--effect on bone remodeling.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; D A Deporter; P A Watson; N Valiquette
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-04

Review 4.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science?

Authors:  Tae-Ju Oh; Joongkyo Yoon; Carl E Misch; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths.

Authors:  Michael P Hänggi; Daniel C Hänggi; John D Schoolfield; Jürg Meyer; David L Cochran; Joachim S Hermann
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure.

Authors:  M R Norton
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.977

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Roodabeh Koodaryan; Ali Hafezeqoran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of varying implant crest module designs on the stress distribution to the bone.

Authors:  Shweta Maruti Patil; Abhijit Suresh Deshpande; Rahul Ramesh Bhalerao; Suryakant Bhanudas Metkari; Prithviraj Maruti Patil
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 May-Jun

3.  Influence of Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Yojana B Patil; Swati Joshi Asopa; Aashana Goel; Divya Jyoti; Nagaveni S Somayaji; Robin Sabharwal
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2020-02-10

4.  Effects of titania nanotubes with or without bovine serum albumin loaded on human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Xiangning Liu; Xiaosong Zhou; Shaobing Li; Renfa Lai; Zhiying Zhou; Ye Zhang; Lei Zhou
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-03-06

5.  Crestal bone loss around dental implants after implantation of Tricalcium phosphate and Platelet- Rich Plasma: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sravani Uppala; Anuj Singh Parihar; Varsha Modipalle; Litto Manual; Vinni Mary Oommen; Pallavi Karadiguddi; Parkhi Gupta
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-01-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.