Literature DB >> 9661058

Fielding standardized patients in primary care settings: lessons from a study using unannounced standardized patients to assess preventive care practices.

J A Brown1, J Abelson, C A Woodward, B Hutchison, G Norman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To document detection and suspicion rates of unannounced standardized patients visiting community-based practices.
DESIGN: Primary care physicians were recruited to participate in a study using standardized patients. Four standardized patient scenarios were used.
SETTING: Community-based primary care physicians' practices in southern Ontario between September 1994 and August 1995. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two primary care physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 'believability' questionnaire completed after all four standardized patients had visited the practices.
RESULTS: Of the primary care physicians approached, 50% (62) agreed to participate. Twenty-one per cent of all visits were suspected as standardized patient encounters. Forty-six per cent suspected one or more standardized patients. Only five physicians (8%) suspected all four standardized patients. Reasons for suspecting standardized patients were associated with the characteristics of the physician's practices, the physician's practice profile and the standardized patient cover story.
CONCLUSION: The portrayal of asymptomatic patients seeking a new primary care physician presents unique challenges. Carefully constructed cover stories, and detailed knowledge of the local area and of the practices of the participating physicians is required to allow standardized patients cases to be tailored to fit into primary care settings without arousing suspicion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9661058     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/10.3.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  3 in total

1.  Caught in the act? Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of physician detection of unannounced standardized patients.

Authors:  Carol E Franz; Ron Epstein; Katherine N Miller; Arthur Brown; Jun Song; Mitchell Feldman; Peter Franks; Steven Kelly-Reif; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Factors associated with open practices: results from the Canadian National Family Physician Survey.

Authors:  Christel A Woodward; Raymond W Pong
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Comparative trial of a short workshop designed to enhance appropriate use of screening tests by family physicians.

Authors:  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Michèle Rivard; Eveline Hudon; Claude Beaudoin; Danielle Saucier; Martine Remondin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.