Literature DB >> 12451077

Comparative trial of a short workshop designed to enhance appropriate use of screening tests by family physicians.

Marie-Dominique Beaulieu1, Michèle Rivard, Eveline Hudon, Claude Beaudoin, Danielle Saucier, Martine Remondin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Educational interventions that support the implementation of complex clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require substantial time commitments from participants. We conducted a comparative study to evaluate if a 90-minute workshop would increase compliance with the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care as well as decrease the ordering of tests not the subject of specific recommendations.
METHODS: Eighty-seven family physicians from Quebec participated in the study. Group assignment was initially randomized, but, owing to logistic problems, randomization was not maintained. After unannounced visits, 2 standardized patients coded the physicians' performance of 23 items recommended for inclusion in the periodic health examination (10 for men and 13 for women) and 8 items recommended for exclusion (4 for both men and women). The "exposed" physicians were visited within 4 to 6 months after the workshop. The "nonexposed" physicians were visited within 4 to 6 months after consent was obtained but before they attended the workshop. We used linear regression analysis to determine if exposure to the workshop resulted in improved performance.
RESULTS: Exposure to the workshop was not associated with a difference in the adjusted mean score for items recommended for inclusion (12.07 for exposed physicians v. 12.35 for those not exposed; maximal and ideal score 23; r = -0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.63 to 1.08). However, workshop exposure was associated with lower adjusted mean scores for items recommended for exclusion (1.55 v. 3.17; maximal score 8, ideal score 0; r = -1.63; 95% CI = -2.50 to -0.75) and for other tests (3.59 v. 6.53; r = -2.95; 95% CI = -5.10 to -0.79).
INTERPRETATION: A short workshop can decrease the ordering of unnecessary screening tests by family physicians. Given its low cost and its potential for general application, such an intervention can support the implementation of prevention CPGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12451077      PMCID: PMC134133     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  10 in total

Review 1.  Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?

Authors:  M Wensing; T van der Weijden; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.

Authors:  L A Bero; R Grilli; J M Grimshaw; E Harvey; A D Oxman; M A Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

3.  Use of standardized patients in the assessment of medical practice.

Authors:  R M Tamblyn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D A Davis; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Provision of preventive care to unannounced standardized patients.

Authors:  B Hutchison; C A Woodward; G R Norman; J Abelson; J A Brown
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies.

Authors:  D A Davis; M A Thomson; A D Oxman; R B Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire.

Authors:  J A Ewing
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Practice guidelines for clinical prevention: do patients, physicians and experts share common ground?

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; E Hudon; D Roberge; R Pineault; D Forté; J Légaré
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The accuracy of standardized patient presentation.

Authors:  R M Tamblyn; D J Klass; G K Schnabl; M L Kopelow
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Fielding standardized patients in primary care settings: lessons from a study using unannounced standardized patients to assess preventive care practices.

Authors:  J A Brown; J Abelson; C A Woodward; B Hutchison; G Norman
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.038

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Nick Black; Stephen Evans; James Carpenter; Fiona Godlee; Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02

2.  Evidence-based periodic health examination of adults. Memory aid for primary care physicians.

Authors:  Stephen D Milone; Stephanie Lopes Milone
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  [The periodic health examination: a comparison of United States and Canadian recommendations].

Authors:  Cléo Mavriplis; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care.

Authors:  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Jeannie Haggerty; Pierre Tousignant; Janet Barnsley; William Hogg; Robert Geneau; Éveline Hudon; Réjean Duplain; Jean-Louis Denis; Lucie Bonin; Claudio Del Grande; Natalyia Dragieva
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Using cognitive behavioural therapy in practice: qualitative study of family physicians' experiences.

Authors:  Ellen Wiebe; Michelle Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Implementing practice guidelines: a workshop on guidelines dissemination and implementation with a focus on asthma and COPD.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Boulet; Allan Becker; Dennis Bowie; Paul Hernandez; Andrew McIvor; Michel Rouleau; Jean Bourbeau; Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; France Légaré; Thomas F Ward; Robert L Cowie; Denis Drouin; Stewart B Harris; Robyn Tamblyn; Pierre Ernst; Wan C Tan; Martyn R Partridge; Philippe Godard; Carla T Herrerias; John W Wilson; Liz Stirling; Emily-Brynn Rozitis; Nancy Garvey; Diane Lougheed; Manon Labrecque; Renata Rea; Martin C Holroyde; Danielle Fagnan; Eileen Dorval; Lisa Pogany; Alan Kaplan; Lisa Cicutto; Mary L Allen; Serge Moraca; J Mark FitzGerald; Francine Borduas
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.409

7.  Screening chest radiography: results from a Greek cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamposioras; Giovanni Casazza; Davide Mauri; Velisarios Lakiotis; Ivan Cortinovis; Apostolos Xilomenos; Christina Peponi; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Athanasios Milousis; Dimitrios Kakaridis; Georgios Zacharias; Ioanna Karathanasi; Georgios Ferentinos; Anastasios Proiskos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  A tool for evaluating the potential for cost-effective outcomes measurement.

Authors:  Melinda M Somasekhar; Alfred Bove; Chris Rausch; James Degnan; Cathy T King; Arnold Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-04-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.