Literature DB >> 9658050

Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTl: center-surround interactions.

S Eifuku1, R H Wurtz.   

Abstract

The medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey extrastriate visual cortex can be divided into a dorsal medial (MSTd) and a lateral ventral (MSTl) region. The functions of the two regions may not be identical: MSTd may process optic flow information that results from the movement of the observer, whereas MSTl may be related more closely to processing visual motion related specifically to the motion of objects. If MSTl were related to such object motion, one would expect to see mechanisms for the segregation of objects from their surround. We investigated one of these mechanisms in MSTl neurons: the effect of stimuli falling in the region surrounding the receptive field center on the response to stimuli falling in the field center. We found the effects of the surround stimulation to be modulatory with little response to the surround stimulus itself but a clear effect on the response to the stimulus falling on the receptive field center. The response to motion in the center in the direction preferred for the neuron usually increased when the surround motion was in the opposite direction to that in the center and decreased when surround motion was in the same direction as that in the center. Fifty-seven percent of the neurons showed a ratio of response for center motion with a surround moving in the opposite direction to that in the center for center motion alone that was >1. The response to motion in the center also increased when the surround stimulus was stationary, and this increase was sometimes larger than that with a moving surround. Nearly 70% of the neurons showed a ratio of response to center motion with a stationary surround to center motion alone that was >1. This is in contrast to the minimal effect of stationary surrounds in middle temporal area neurons. When the stimulus presentation was reversed so that the stimulus in the center was stationary and the surround moved, some MSTl neurons responded when the direction of motion in the surround was in the direction opposite to the preferred direction of motion in the center of the receptive field. Stimulation of the surround thus had a profound effect on the response of MSTl neurons, and this pronounced effect of the surround is consistent with a role in the segmentation of objects using motion.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9658050     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

1.  Specificity of projections from wide-field and local motion-processing regions within the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey.

Authors:  V K Berezovskii; R T Born
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A theory of geometric constraints on neural activity for natural three-dimensional movement.

Authors:  K Zhang; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual, auditory and bimodal activity in the banks of the lateral suprasylvian sulcus in the cat.

Authors:  Rami Yaka; Nataliya Notkin; Uri Yinon; Zvi Wollberg
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

4.  Short-latency ocular following in humans is dependent on absolute (rather than relative) binocular disparity.

Authors:  D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  An effect of relative motion on trajectory discrimination.

Authors:  Scott A Beardsley; Lucia M Vaina
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A neural model for the integration of stereopsis and motion parallax in structure-from-motion.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Mapping the macaque superior temporal sulcus: functional delineation of vergence and version eye-movement-related activity.

Authors:  Matthew K Ward; Mark S Bolding; Kevin P Schultz; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Processing of object motion and self-motion in the lateral subdivision of the medial superior temporal area in macaques.

Authors:  Ryo Sasaki; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.

Authors:  Lowell Thompson; Mohan Ji; Bas Rokers; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Human v6: the medial motion area.

Authors:  S Pitzalis; M I Sereno; G Committeri; P Fattori; G Galati; F Patria; C Galletti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.