BACKGROUND: This study tested the ability of sequential shocks delivered through dual-current pathways to lower the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) compared with a biphasic shock through a standard single-current pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RA), left subclavian vein (LSV), proximal coronary sinus (CSos), and distal coronary sinus (DCS) in 14 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (170+/-185 days). Using a step-up protocol, we compared ADFTs for a single-current pathway (RA-->DCS) that used a single 7.5/2.5-ms biphasic shock from a 150-microF capacitor with those for a dual-current pathway system (RA-->DCS followed by CSos-->LSV) using sequential 7.5/2.5-ms biphasic shocks with capacitor discharge waveforms for 150-microF and 600-microF capacitors. Both dual-current pathway configurations (2.0+/-0.4 J for 150-microF capacitance, 2.4+/-0.5 J for 600-microF capacitance) had a significantly lower ADFT than the single-current pathway (5.1+/-1.8 J). Whereas the dual-current pathway with 150-microF capacitor shocks had a significantly lower energy threshold, there was no statistical difference in terms of leading-edge voltage compared with the dual-current pathway with 600-microF capacitance shocks. There were no ventricular arrhythmias induced with appropriately synchronized shocks. CONCLUSIONS: For internal atrial defibrillation in humans, sequential biphasic waveforms delivered over dual-current pathways resulted in a markedly reduced (>50% reduction) ADFT compared with a single shock over a single-current pathway.
BACKGROUND: This study tested the ability of sequential shocks delivered through dual-current pathways to lower the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) compared with a biphasic shock through a standard single-current pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RA), left subclavian vein (LSV), proximal coronary sinus (CSos), and distal coronary sinus (DCS) in 14 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (170+/-185 days). Using a step-up protocol, we compared ADFTs for a single-current pathway (RA-->DCS) that used a single 7.5/2.5-ms biphasic shock from a 150-microF capacitor with those for a dual-current pathway system (RA-->DCS followed by CSos-->LSV) using sequential 7.5/2.5-ms biphasic shocks with capacitor discharge waveforms for 150-microF and 600-microF capacitors. Both dual-current pathway configurations (2.0+/-0.4 J for 150-microF capacitance, 2.4+/-0.5 J for 600-microF capacitance) had a significantly lower ADFT than the single-current pathway (5.1+/-1.8 J). Whereas the dual-current pathway with 150-microF capacitor shocks had a significantly lower energy threshold, there was no statistical difference in terms of leading-edge voltage compared with the dual-current pathway with 600-microF capacitance shocks. There were no ventricular arrhythmias induced with appropriately synchronized shocks. CONCLUSIONS: For internal atrial defibrillation in humans, sequential biphasic waveforms delivered over dual-current pathways resulted in a markedly reduced (>50% reduction) ADFT compared with a single shock over a single-current pathway.
Authors: S Saskena; M J Domanski; E J Benjamin; A J Camm; M D Ezekowitz; B J Gersh; J Jalife; G V Naccarelli; R E Vlietstra; D G Wyse Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 1.900