Literature DB >> 17336885

Intracardiac atrial defibrillation.

Derek J Dosdall1, Raymond E Ideker.   

Abstract

Intravascular ventricular defibrillation and intravascular atrial defibrillation have many similarities. An important factor influencing the outcome of the shock is the potential gradient field created throughout the ventricles or the atria by the shock. A minimum potential gradient is required throughout the ventricles and probably the atria in order to defibrillate. The value of this minimum potential gradient is affected by several factors, including the duration, tilt, and number of phases of the waveform. For shock strengths near the defibrillation threshold, earliest activation following failed shocks arises in a region in which the potential gradient is low. The defibrillation threshold energy can be decreased by adding a third and even a fourth defibrillation electrode in regions where the shock potential gradient is low for the shock field created by the first two defibrillation electrodes and giving two sequential shocks, each through a different set of electrodes. However, the addition of more electrodes and sequential shocks complicates both the device and its implantation. Because patients are conscious when the atrial defibrillation shock is given, they experience pain during the shock, which is one of the main drawbacks of intravascular atrial defibrillation. Unfortunately, the pain threshold for defibrillation shocks is so low that a shock less than 1 J is uncomfortable and is not much less painful than shocks several times stronger. Therefore, even though electrode configurations exist that have lower atrial defibrillation threshold energy requirements than the atrial defibrillation threshold with standard defibrillation electrode configurations used in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for ventricular defibrillation, they are not clinically practical because their shocks are almost as painful as with the standard ICD electrode configurations. Such electrode configurations would make the ICD more complicated, leading to greater difficulty and longer time required for implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17336885      PMCID: PMC1868675          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  36 in total

1.  Low-energy internal cardioversion in patients with long-lasting atrial fibrillation refractory to external electrical cardioversion: results and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G Gasparini; A Bonso; S Themistoclakis; F Giada; A Raviele
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; David S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; G Neal Kay; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; Samuel Wann; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffery L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Jonathan L Halperin; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; A John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap W Deckers; Catherine Despres; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; Joao Morais; Ady Osterspey; Juan Luis Tamargo; José Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Efficacy and tolerability of automatic nighttime atrial fibrillation shocks in patients with permanent internal atrial defibrillators.

Authors:  Charles I Haffajee; G Muqtada Chaudhry; David Casavant; Patti E Pacetti
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Transvenous low energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a review of clinical applications and future developments.

Authors:  G Boriani; M Biffi; C Camanini; R M Luceri; A Branzi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Right atrial septal electrode for reducing the atrial defibrillation threshold.

Authors:  X Zheng; M E Benser; G P Walcott; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.

Authors:  M E Benser; G P Walcott; C R Killingsworth; S D Girouard; M M Morris; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-08

7.  Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks.

Authors:  S Mittal; S Ayati; K M Stein; D Schwartzman; D Cavlovich; P J Tchou; S M Markowitz; D J Slotwiner; M A Scheiner; B B Lerman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Antiarrhythmic agents in facilitating electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and promoting maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Authors:  G M Marcus; R J Sung
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.869

9.  Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study.

Authors:  A S Go; E M Hylek; K A Phillips; Y Chang; L E Henault; J V Selby; D E Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Internal atrial defibrillation during electrophysiological studies and focal atrial fibrillation ablation procedures.

Authors:  M R Karch; S Schmieder; G Ndrepepa; M A Schneider; B Zrenner; C Schmitt
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Vladimir G Fast; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Cardiovascular disease: several small shocks beat one big one.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; John P Wikswo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Homogenization of Atrial Electrical Activities: Conceptual Restoration of Regional Electrophysiological Parameters to Deter Ischemia-Dependent Conflictogenic Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Petras Stirbys
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

4.  Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy.

Authors:  Christina M Ambrosi; Crystal M Ripplinger; Igor R Efimov; Vadim V Fedorov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review.

Authors:  Skylar Buchan; Ronit Kar; Mathews John; Allison Post; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Programmed inappropriate ICD ventricular defibrillation for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; George Grekas; Thomas Pappas; John A Goudevenos
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2008-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.