Literature DB >> 9657187

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting prognosis.

S Naderi1, S Ozgen, M N Pamir, M M Ozek, C Erzen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A variety of factors may affect surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The aim of this study is to determine these factors on the basis of preoperative radiological and clinical data.
METHODS: To assess the factors affecting postoperative outcome after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the clinical and radiological data of 27 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Functional and neurological statuses were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale modified by Benzel. In all patients, the effect of age, symptom duration, cervical curvature, presence or absence of preoperative high signal intensity within the spinal cord as revealed by T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and diameters of the spinal canal and vertebral body on pre- and postoperative neurological statuses were investigated. Plain radiographs were obtained for all patients, magnetic resonance images for 21 patients (77.8%), computed tomographic scans for 13 patients (48.1%), myelograms for 6 patients (22.2%), and computed tomographic myelograms for 4 patients (14.8%). There were five patients with a JOA score of 10, six patients with a JOA score of 11, six patients with a JOA score of 12, four patients with a JOA score of 13, four patients with a JOA score of 14, one patient with a JOA score of 15, and one patient with a JOA score of 16. All patients underwent cervical laminectomies. The mean follow-up period was 54.1 months. The final neurological examinations revealed improvement in the JOA scores of 85.1 % of the patients.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis of all patients revealed mean JOA scores of 12.185 +/- 1.618 and 14.370 +/- 2.15 before surgery and at final examination, respectively. The difference between the preoperative JOA score and the final JOA score was determined to be statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Statistical analyses also showed better neurological improvement in patients younger than 60 years and in patients with normal preoperative cervical lordosis. Although patients without preoperative high signal intensity of the spinal cord showed a better improvement rate than did patients with preoperative high signal intensity, the determined difference was statistically insignificant.
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that age and abnormal cervical curvature predict less postoperative neurological improvement. The presence of preoperative high signal intensity within the spinal cord may also reflect less neurological improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9657187     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199807000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  39 in total

1.  The Relationship between Neck Pain and Cervical Alignment in Young Female Nursing Staff.

Authors:  Jang-Hun Kim; Joo Han Kim; Jong-Hyun Kim; Taek-Hyun Kwon; Yoon-Kwan Park; Hong Joo Moon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Joon Woo Lee; Jae Hyoung Kim; Jong Bin Park; Kun Woo Park; Jin S Yeom; Guen Young Lee; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  How old is your cervical spine? Cervical spine biological age: a new evaluation scale.

Authors:  Venceslao Wierzbicki; Alessandro Pesce; Luigi Marrocco; Emanuele Piccione; Claudio Colonnese; Riccardo Caruso
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Correlation between diffusion tensor imaging parameters and clinical assessments in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy with and without high signal intensity.

Authors:  Y Liu; C Kong; L Cui; X Yuan; P Zhao; Y Zhang; Y Guan; X Chen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Prognostic value of intraoperative MEP signal improvement during surgical treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Ye Tian; Chu Wang; Xin Lu; Qianyu Zhuang; Huiming Peng; Jianhua Hu; Yu Zhao; Jianxiong Shen; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy.

Authors:  Hans-Ekkehart Vitzthum; Kristina Dalitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Single level cervical disc herniation: A questionnaire based study on current surgical practices.

Authors:  Saeid Abrishamkar; Yousef Karimi; Mohammadreza Safavi; Pouria Tavakoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.