Literature DB >> 9656486

Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1.

A L Hughes1.   

Abstract

There are 10 gene families that have members on both human chromosome 6 (6p21.3, the location of the human major histocompatibility complex [MHC]) and human chromosome 9 (mostly 9q33-34). Six of these families also have members on mouse chromosome 17 (the mouse MHC chromosome) and mouse chromosome 2. In addition, four of these families have members on human chromosome 1 (1q21-25 and 1p13), and two of these have members on mouse chromosome 1. One hypothesis to explain these patterns is that members of the 10 gene families of human chromosomes 6 and 9 were duplicated simultaneously as a result of polyploidization or duplication of a chromosome segment ("block duplication"). A subsequent block duplication has been proposed to account for the presence of representatives of four of these families on human chromosome 1. Phylogenetic analyses of the 9 gene families for which data were available decisively rejected the hypothesis of block duplication as an overall explanation of these patterns. Three to five of the genes on human chromosomes 6 and 9 probably duplicated simultaneously early in vertebrate history, prior to the divergence of jawed and jawless vertebrates, and shortly after that, all four of the genes on chromosomes 1 and 9 probably duplicated as a block. However, the other genes duplicated at different times scattered over at least 1.6 billion years. Since the occurrence of these clusters of related genes cannot be explained by block duplication, one alternative explanation is that they cluster together because of shared functional characteristics relating to expression patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9656486     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  26 in total

1.  Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes.

Authors:  R Friedman; A L Hughes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Genomic anatomy of a premier major histocompatibility complex paralogous region on chromosome 1q21-q22.

Authors:  T Shiina; A Ando; Y Suto; F Kasai; A Shigenari; N Takishima; E Kikkawa; K Iwata; Y Kuwano; Y Kitamura; Y Matsuzawa; K Sano; M Nogami; H Kawata; S Li; Y Fukuzumi; M Yamazaki; H Tashiro; G Tamiya; A Kohda; K Okumura; T Ikemura; E Soeda; N Mizuki; M Kimura; S Bahram; H Inoko
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Were vertebrates octoploid?

Authors:  Rebecca F Furlong; Peter W H Holland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  An antecedent of the MHC-linked genomic region in amphioxus.

Authors:  L Filipe C Castro; Rebecca F Furlong; Peter W H Holland
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  2R or not 2R: testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates.

Authors:  Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

Review 6.  The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence.

Authors:  Karsten Hokamp; Aoife McLysaght; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

7.  Evolutionary history of the vertebrate period genes.

Authors:  Malcolm von Schantz; Aaron Jenkins; Simon N Archer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  The descent of the antibody-based immune system by gradual evolution.

Authors:  Jan Klein; Nikolas Nikolaidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phylogenetic analyses of human 1/2/8/20 paralogons suggest segmental duplications during animal evolution.

Authors:  Farhan Haq; Usman Saeed; Rida Khalid; Muhammad Qasim; Maryam Mehmood
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts.

Authors:  Amir Ali Abbasi
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.