Literature DB >> 31139548

Phylogenetic analyses of human 1/2/8/20 paralogons suggest segmental duplications during animal evolution.

Farhan Haq1, Usman Saeed2, Rida Khalid1, Muhammad Qasim3, Maryam Mehmood1.   

Abstract

Susumu Ohno hypothesized that the diversity of vertebrate gene families and genome is due to two rounds of whole genome duplications (also referred as 2R hypothesis). The quadruplicate paralogous blocks present on 1/2/8/20 chromosomes are taken as one of the evidences in favor of the 2R. In this study, we investigated that whether 2R has shaped the vertebrate evolution using gene families residing on chromosomes 1/2/8/20. Evolutionary history of 22 gene families (11 from the current study and 11 from the previous study) was evaluated by the phylogenetic analysis with triplicated or quadruplicated distribution on these human chromosomes 1/2/8/20. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using high-quality whole genomic sequence data of multiple species with neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. The phylogenetic tree topology of these gene families revealed variable duplication time points during invertebrate-vertebrate evolution. Topology comparison approach categorized 22 gene families into three groups. Tree topologies of ten gene families fell into Group 1 (duplications prior to invertebrate-vertebrate split), four in Group 2 (i.e., (AB) (C) (D), topology incongruent with 2R) and eight in Group 3 (((AB) (CD)), 2R congruent topology). Therefore, taken together the current and previous data of 1/2/8/20 paralogons, we propose that, in addition to whole genome duplications events, current developmental, morphological and genomic complexity of the vertebrate genomes may also have originated through segmental duplications occurring at varying time points during the course of animal evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2R hypothesis; Paralogous blocks; Phylogenetics; Segmental duplications; Tree topology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31139548      PMCID: PMC6534647          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1768-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  33 in total

1.  Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the "one-to-four rule".

Authors:  A Martin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history.

Authors:  A L Hughes
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization.

Authors:  K H Wolfe
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach.

Authors:  S Whelan; N Goldman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Were vertebrates octoploid?

Authors:  Rebecca F Furlong; Peter W H Holland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evidence of en bloc duplication in vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Laurent Abi-Rached; André Gilles; Takashi Shiina; Pierre Pontarotti; Hidetoshi Inoko
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Recent segmental duplications in the human genome.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bailey; Zhiping Gu; Royden A Clark; Knut Reinert; Rhea V Samonte; Stuart Schwartz; Mark D Adams; Eugene W Myers; Peter W Li; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Genome size and developmental complexity.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution.

Authors:  Aoife McLysaght; Karsten Hokamp; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Evidence in favour of ancient octaploidy in the vertebrate genome.

Authors:  T J Gibson; J Spring
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.