Literature DB >> 9656189

Transformation of C3H 10T1/2 cells by low doses of ionising radiation: a collaborative study by six European laboratories strongly supporting a linear dose-response relationship.

A J Mill1, D Frankenberg, D Bettega, L Hieber, A Saran, L A Allen, P Calzolari, M Frankenberg-Schwager, M M Lehane, G R Morgan, L Pariset, S Pazzaglia, C J Roberts, L Tallone.   

Abstract

For the assessment of radiation risk at low doses, it is presumed that the shape of the low-dose-response curve in humans for cancer induction is linear. Epidemiological data alone are unlikely to ever have the statistical power needed to confirm this assumption. Another approach is to use oncogenic transformation in vitro as a surrogate for carcinogenesis in vivo. In mid-1990, six European laboratories initiated such an approach using C3H 10T1/2 mouse cells. Rigid standardisation procedures were established followed by collaborative measurements of transformation down to absorbed doses of 0.25 Gy of x-radiation resulting in a total of 759 transformed foci. The results clearly support a linear dose-response relationship for cell transformation in vitro with no evidence for a threshold dose or for an enhanced, supralinear response at doses approximately 200-300 mGy. For radiological protection this represents a large dose, and the limitations of this approach are apparent. Only by understanding the fundamental mechanisms involved in radiation carcinogenesis will further knowledge concerning the effects of low doses become available. These results will, however, help validate new biologically based models of radiation cancer risk thus providing increased confidence in the estimation of cancer risk at low doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9656189     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  5 in total

1.  Comment on "re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells" by W. Göggelmann, C. Jacobsen, W. Panzer et al. (2003) Radiat Environ Biophys 42:175-182.

Authors:  Dietrich Harder
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Detrimental and protective bystander effects: a model approach.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R E J Mitchel; J L Redpath; D J Crawford-Brown; W Hofmann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A Mechanistic DNA Repair and Survival Model (Medras): Applications to Intrinsic Radiosensitivity, Relative Biological Effectiveness and Dose-Rate.

Authors:  Stephen Joseph McMahon; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  What we know and what we don't know about cancer risks associated with radiation doses from radiological imaging.

Authors:  D J Brenner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.