Literature DB >> 9655992

Feces, dead horses, and fleas. Evolution of the hostile use of biological agents.

M E Lesho1, M D Dorsey, D Bunner.   

Abstract

Selected events in the history of biological weapons are highlighted to increase physicians' awareness of the threat of biological weapons. The hostile use of biological substances originated in antiquity and pervades the history of human conflict. Although difficult to verify at times, the use of such weaponry has not been limited to national militaries. Disgruntled civilians and even physicians have used biological weapons to promote their interests. Their potency, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to manufacture and deploy them with little sophistication, or under the semblance of legitimate commercial endeavors, will ensure that biological weapons remain a constant threat to public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9655992      PMCID: PMC1305067     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  16 in total

Review 1.  Biological defense research: charting a safer course.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; B H Rosenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Biosensors for chemical and biological agents of defence interest.

Authors:  B M Paddle
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Strategies for the prevention of a successful biological warfare aerosol attack.

Authors:  S L Wiener
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Biological warfare. A historical perspective.

Authors:  G W Christopher; T J Cieslak; J A Pavlin; E M Eitzen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Serratia marcescens: historical perspective and clinical review.

Authors:  V L Yu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  From asps to allegations: biological warfare in history.

Authors:  A G Robertson; L J Robertson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Biological warfare in the twentieth century: lessons from the past, challenges for the future.

Authors:  J A Mobley
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979.

Authors:  M Meselson; J Guillemin; M Hugh-Jones; A Langmuir; I Popova; A Shelokov; O Yampolskaya
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A large community outbreak of salmonellosis caused by intentional contamination of restaurant salad bars.

Authors:  T J Török; R V Tauxe; R P Wise; J R Livengood; R Sokolow; S Mauvais; K A Birkness; M R Skeels; J M Horan; L R Foster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  An outbreak of Shigella dysenteriae type 2 among laboratory workers due to intentional food contamination.

Authors:  S A Kolavic; A Kimura; S L Simons; L Slutsker; S Barth; C E Haley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biological warfare.

Authors:  J Suchard
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Francisella tularensis: taxonomy, genetics, and Immunopathogenesis of a potential agent of biowarfare.

Authors:  Molly K McLendon; Michael A Apicella; Lee-Ann H Allen
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Antimicrobial peptides as new recognition molecules for screening challenging species.

Authors:  Nadezhda V Kulagina; Kara M Shaffer; Frances S Ligler; Chris R Taitt
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 7.460

4.  Zoonoses likely to be used in bioterrorism.

Authors:  C Patrick Ryan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Risk Analysis Tools for Differentiating Unnatural From Natural Epidemics.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.437

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.