Literature DB >> 9655104

Revision total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenoid arthrosis.

J W Sperling1, R H Cofield.   

Abstract

The development of painful glenoid arthrosis is the most common reason for reoperation after replacement of the humeral head. We performed twenty-two revision total shoulder arthroplasties, between 1983 and 1992, for the treatment of painful glenoid arthrosis in shoulders that had a prosthetic replacement of the humeral head. Eighteen shoulders (seventeen patients) were included in the study as their preoperative and operative records were complete and they had been followed for at least two years (mean, 5.5 years; range, 2.3 to 10.0 years). The indications for the hemiarthroplasty were trauma (ten shoulders), osteoarthrosis (four), rheumatoid arthritis (two), and osteonecrosis secondary to the use of steroids (two). The mean interval between the hemiarthroplasty and the total shoulder replacement was 4.4 years (range, 0.8 to 12.7 years). The mean score for pain in the shoulder decreased from 4.3 points before the revision to 2.2 points after it (p = 0.0001). The mean active abduction increased from 94 degrees before the revision to 124 degrees after it (p = 0.01), and the mean external rotation increased from 32 to 58 degrees (p = 0.007). Two shoulders needed another operation after the revision because of a late infection in one and particulate synovitis associated with instability in the other. With the numbers available for study, we did not detect a significant difference in pain relief and range of motion with respect to gender, diagnosis, subluxation, or the presence of periprosthetic radiolucency. Our findings indicate that most patients with painful glenoid arthrosis after a hemiarthroplasty have marked pain relief and improvement in motion after revision to a total shoulder replacement. However, seven of the eighteen shoulders that had this procedure had an unsatisfactory result due to a limited range of motion or the need for a subsequent operation. Therefore, long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the durability of total shoulder replacement in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9655104     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  21 in total

1.  Does an increase in modularity improve the outcomes of total shoulder replacement? Comparison across design generations.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Cathy Schleck; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure--midterm results.

Authors:  Matthias P Flury; Philipp Frey; Joerg Goldhahn; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Beat R Simmen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is shoulder arthroplasty an option for charcot arthropathy?

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteo-chondrodysplasias.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield; Mark Morrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Shoulder arthroplasty for locked anterior shoulder dislocation: a role for the reversed design.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Bradley S Schoch; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  National trends and perioperative outcomes in primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty: Trends in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian E Schwartz; David D Savin; Ari R Youderian; David Mossad; Benjamin A Goldberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Difference in clinical outcome between total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty used in hemiarthroplasty revision surgery.

Authors:  Bas Pieter Hartel; Tjarco D Alta; Miguel E Sewnath; Willem J Willems
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Cyanoacrylate microbial sealant may reduce the prevalence of positive cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adam J Lorenzetti; Montri D Wongworawat; Christopher M Jobe; Wesley P Phipatanakul
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Glenoid reconstruction in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bassem Elhassan; Mehmet Ozbaydar; Lawrence D Higgins; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Conversion of stemmed hemi- or total to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: advantages of a modular stem design.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Paul Borbas; Eugene T Ek; Dominik C Meyer; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.