Literature DB >> 9655100

Interrelationships of clinical outcome, length of resection, and energy cost of walking after prosthetic knee replacement following resection of a malignant tumor of the distal aspect of the femur.

A Kawai1, S I Backus, J C Otis, J H Healey.   

Abstract

The relationships between the functional score according to the system of the International Society of Limb Salvage, the extent of resection, energy cost of walking, and gait characteristics were studied in thirty-six patients who had had segmental knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal aspect of the femur. The mean free-walking velocity was 62.3 meters per minute (79 per cent of normal), which was a result of decreases in both cadence and stride length. The mean net energy cost during walking was 35 per cent greater than that of normal controls and correlated with the percentage of the femur that had been resected. All patients had decreased single-limb support time on the affected side compared with the unaffected side. There was a weak correlation between the asymmetry of the single-limb support time and the percentage of the femur that had been resected. The mean extensor torque of the affected knee was 30 per cent that of the unaffected knee when one head of the quadriceps muscle had been excised, 19 per cent when two heads had been excised, 4 per cent when three heads had been excised, and 1 per cent when four heads had been excised. The patients who had had an extra-articular resection had lower mean extensor and flexor torques at the knee compared with those who had had an intra-articular resection. The asymmetry of the single-limb support time was inversely related to the residual extensor and flexor torques. The overall score according to the system of the International Society of Limb Salvage ranged from 17 to 29 points (mean, 24.6 points; 82 per cent of normal). The net energy cost, percentage of maximum aerobic capacity, and asymmetry of the single-limb support time had significant negative correlations with the overall functional score. Multivariate analysis showed that the overall functional score and the percentage of the femur that had been resected were the two most important factors that predicted the net energy cost. To our knowledge, this is the first objective validation of the functional score according to the system of the International Society of Limb Salvage. As the net energy cost can be predicted from universally available, inexpensive measures, investigators can easily use it as a clinical and research tool to evaluate prosthetic performance and to assess operative outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9655100     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Does limb-salvage surgery offer patients better quality of life and functional capacity than amputation?

Authors:  Farbod Malek; Jeremy S Somerson; Shannon Mitchel; Ronald P Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of gait parameters in distal femoral replacement using a metallic endoprosthesis versus allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Fahad AlGheshyan; Moataz Eltoukhy; Khaled Zakaria; Harry Thomas Temple; Shihab Asfour
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-23

3.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS® Modular Endoprostheses for Reconstruction of Tumor Resection of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia?

Authors:  Hannes A Rüdiger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Editorial: Importance of Validating the Scores We Use to Assess Patients with Musculoskeletal Tumors.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights®: Which Sport Activity Levels Are Achieved in Patients After Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for a Proximal Femur Bone Sarcoma?

Authors:  Nicola Fabbri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Megaprosthesis versus Condyle-sparing intercalary allograft: distal femoral sarcoma.

Authors:  Melissa N Zimel; Amy M Cizik; Timothy B Rapp; Jason S Weisstein; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Pediatric patients with a malignant bone tumor: when does functional assessment make sense?

Authors:  Corinna Caroline Winter; Carsten Müller; Jendrik Hardes; Joachim Boos; Georg Gosheger; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  What Is the Survival of the Telescope Allograft Technique to Augment a Short Proximal Femur Segment in Children After Resection and Distal Femur Endoprosthesis Reconstruction for a Bone Sarcoma?

Authors:  Suraj Hindiskere; Eric Staals; Davide Maria Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Gait Analysis in Patients with Wide Resection and Endoprosthesis Replacement Around the Knee.

Authors:  Vivek Ajit Singh; Chan Wei Heng; Nor Faissal Yasin
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.