Literature DB >> 9650126

Obstetric outcome in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy.

K Harrington1, O Thompson, L Jordan, J Page, R G Carpenter, S Campbell.   

Abstract

A complaint of decreased fetal movements is a common indication for the assessment of fetal well being. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of a group of women whose primary indication for referral was decreased fetal movements. Over a 20 month period, 435 patients were seen in the fetal assessment unit of an inner London teaching hospital, following a primary complaint of reduced fetal movements. Investigations included: the fetal abdominal circumference (AC), amniotic fluid volume (AFV), the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UAPI) derived from Doppler ultrasound waveforms and a computerised analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) recordings or cardiotocograph (CTG). Outcome measures were: gestational age at delivery, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, admission to the Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU), the need for delivery by an emergency cesarean section for fetal compromise (CSFC), and any perinatal deaths. A comparison of actual versus expected outcome for women with decreased fetal movement revealed the following relative risks, with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) in brackets; low 5 minute Apgar score 0.03 vs. 0.05 expected (CI = 0.01, 0.05), SCBU admission, 0.06 vs. 0.07 (0.04, 0.08), and preterm delivery, 0.08 vs. 0.11 (0.05, 0.10). Cesarean sections for fetal compromise, 0.07 vs. 0.053 (0.050-0.096). The addition of FHR monitoring to standard ultrasound assessment of well being did not appear to confer any added benefit. There were no fetal deaths. The outcome for pregnancies where the mother presents with decreased fetal movements in the third trimester is comparable with the outcome for the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9650126     DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1998.26.2.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  8 in total

1.  Daily Fetal Movement Count Chart : Reducing Perinatal Mortality in Low Risk Pregnancy.

Authors:  G Singh; K Sidhu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 2.  Professional and patient perspectives of NICE guidelines to abandon maternal monitoring of fetal movements.

Authors:  Ian Hill-Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies.

Authors:  J G Lalor; B Fawole; Z Alfirevic; D Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

4.  Risk factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in planned vaginal breech labors at term: a retrospective population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Georg Macharey; Mika Gissler; Veli-Matti Ulander; Leena Rahkonen; Mervi Väisänen-Tommiska; Mika Nuutila; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  A comparison of risk factors for breech presentation in preterm and term labor: a nationwide, population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Anna E Toijonen; Seppo T Heinonen; Mika V M Gissler; Georg Macharey
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women - a clinical quality improvement.

Authors:  Eli Saastad; Julie Victoria Holm Tveit; Vicki Flenady; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Ruth C Fretts; Per E Børdahl; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-04

7.  A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Adrienne Gordon; Qiushuang Li; Jon A Hyett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Roger K Freeman; Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.