Literature DB >> 9645896

Prospective comparison of flecainide versus sotalol for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

J Reisinger1, E Gatterer, G Heinze, K Wiesinger, E Zeindlhofer, M Gattermeier, G Poelzl, H Kratzer, A Ebner, W Hohenwallner, K Lenz, J Slany, P Kuhn.   

Abstract

This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous flecainide and sotalol for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. We performed a prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial, including 106 hemodynamically stable patients with atrial fibrillation, stratified according to duration of the arrhythmia. Exclusion criteria included severely reduced left ventricular systolic function, recent antiarrhythmic therapy, and hypokalemia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous flecainide or intravenous sotalol. Trial medication was given at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg body weight (maximum 150 mg). Overall, 28 of 54 patients (52%) given flecainide and 12 of 52 patients (23%) given sotalol converted to sinus rhythm during the first 2 hours after start of the infusion (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed that treatment allocation to flecainide, an arrhythmia duration of < or = 24 hours, higher plasma magnesium level at baseline, higher age for men, and lower age for women independently increases the probability of conversion. The frequency of adverse effects was not significantly different in the 2 treatment groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9645896     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00223-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent electrophysiological effect of ibutilide on human atrium and ventricle.

Authors:  N Oshikawa; I Watanabe; R Masaki; A Shindo; T Kojima; S Saito; Y Ozawa; K Kanmatsuse
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  J R Ehrlich; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-01

Review 3.  Atrial fibrillation: choosing an antiarrhythmic drug.

Authors:  Todd Rudo; Peter Kowey
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents at promoting sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  G Nichol; F McAlister; B Pham; A Laupacis; B Shea; M Green; A Tang; G Wells
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: current management and treatment options.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Igor Diemberger; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Present treatment options for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S K S Lairikyengbam; M H Anderson; A G Davies
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Emergency management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Wakai; J O O'Neill
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  Rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muath Alobaida; Abdullah Alrumayh
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

9.  Pediatric Dosing of Intravenous Sotalol Based on Body Surface Area in Patients with Arrhythmia.

Authors:  Xiaomei Li; Yan Zhang; Haiju Liu; He Jiang; Haiyan Ge; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  The inward rectifier current inhibitor PA-6 terminates atrial fibrillation and does not cause ventricular arrhythmias in goat and dog models.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Rosanne Varkevisser; Dragan Opacic; Alexandre Bossu; Marion Kuiper; Jet D M Beekman; Sihyung Yang; Azinwi Phina Khan; Dobromir Dobrev; Niels Voigt; Michael Zhuo Wang; Sander Verheule; Marc A Vos; Marcel A G van der Heyden
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.