Literature DB >> 16956453

Atrial fibrillation: choosing an antiarrhythmic drug.

Todd Rudo1, Peter Kowey.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The associated hemodynamic changes can lead to symptoms of palpitations, fatigue, light-headedness, or dyspnea. Extensive research in the use of antiarrhythmic drugs has been performed both to facilitate the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and to maintain normal sinus rhythm. The relative merits of a rhythm control versus rate control strategy are briefly discussed. Efficacy of the available agents for pharmacologic cardioversion is reviewed in detail. Important drugs for maintenance of sinus rhythm include amiodarone, flecainide, propafenone, sotalol, and dofetilide. Selection of the appropriate antiarrhythmic drug must be individualized to the clinical situation, with Class IC drugs being first-line agents in the absence of structural heart disease. Regardless of agent selected, appropriate monitoring for development of adverse effects is of utmost importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16956453     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-006-0077-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  42 in total

1.  Oral amiodarone increases the efficacy of direct-current cardioversion in restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Capucci; G Q Villani; D Aschieri; A Rosi; M F Piepoli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Rhythm versus rate control trials in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  D George Wyse
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-09

3.  Intravenous dofetilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, for the termination of sustained atrial fibrillation or flutter. Intravenous Dofetilide Investigators.

Authors:  R H Falk; A Pollak; S N Singh; T Friedrich
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Inpatient versus outpatient antiarrhythmic drug initiation: safety and cost-effectiveness issues.

Authors:  J A Reiffel
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  V Fuster; L E Rydén; R W Asinger; D S Cannom; H J Crijns; R L Frye; J L Halperin; G N Kay; W W Klein; S Lévy; R L McNamara; E N Prystowsky; L S Wann; D G Wyse; R J Gibbons; E M Antman; J S Alpert; D P Faxon; V Fuster; G Gregoratos; L F Hiratzka; A K Jacobs; R O Russell; S C Smith; W W Klein; A Alonso-Garcia; C Blomström-Lundqvist; G De Backer; M Flather; J Hradec; A Oto; A Parkhomenko; S Silber; A Torbicki
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Bramah N Singh; Steven N Singh; Domenic J Reda; X Charlene Tang; Becky Lopez; Crystal L Harris; Ross D Fletcher; Satish C Sharma; J Edwin Atwood; Alan K Jacobson; H Daniel Lewis; Dennis W Raisch; Michael D Ezekowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Sotalol.

Authors:  S H Hohnloser; R L Woosley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prospective comparison of flecainide versus sotalol for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J Reisinger; E Gatterer; G Heinze; K Wiesinger; E Zeindlhofer; M Gattermeier; G Poelzl; H Kratzer; A Ebner; W Hohenwallner; K Lenz; J Slany; P Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats.

Authors:  M C Wijffels; C J Kirchhof; R Dorland; M A Allessie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications.

Authors:  W M Feinberg; J L Blackshear; A Laupacis; R Kronmal; R G Hart
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-03-13
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Authors:  Felix Hohendanner; F R Heinzel; F Blaschke; B M Pieske; W Haverkamp; H L Boldt; A S Parwani
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Efficacy and safety in pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matching to compare amiodarone vs class IC antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  Antonio Bonora; Gianni Turcato; Elena Franchi; Gabriele Taioli; Alice Dilda; Germana Zerman; Antonio Maccagnani; Claudio Pistorelli; Oliviero Olivieri
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.397

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.