Literature DB >> 9645556

Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect.

L Forsten1.   

Abstract

The anticariogenic effect of silicate cement is well known and considered a result of fluoride release. In several studies a similar fluoride release from conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) has been established. Therefore, an anticariogenic effect may be predicted from the GICs too. In my studies the fluoride release was studied by exposing the test specimens to a continuous flow of running tap water. At certain time periods the specimens were transferred for 1 week in a small amount of deionized water (5 ml). The determination of the fluoride content of the solution showed the fluoride release of the material at that time. There was an initial 'burst' effect of fluoride release and then the release gradually decreased, settling at a constant level. The long-term release from conventional GICs was shown to remain on the same level for at least 8 years. The amount of the constant release did not differ much between different brands. Resin-modified GICs released fluoride to the same extent and in the similar way as conventional GICs whereas polyacid-modified composites ('compomers') did not show an initial fluoride 'burst' effect. To study the fluoride binding ability of GICs, specimens which had been exposed to running water for different periods of time were treated with a 50 ppm fluoride solution. After this 'recharging' GIC and resin-modified GIC specimens released more than twice the amount of fluoride released before the treatment. The fluoride treatment had no effect on polyacid-modified composites or on fluoride-containing composites or on the amalgams. To get an impression of the clinical effect of GICs a questionnaire was handed out to practitioners attending courses in the Nordic countries and in Australia during the period 1991-1992 which resulted in 954 answers. Among other questions, the dentists were asked if they had observed caries and gingival inflammation in association with GIC and composite fillings. According to the opinion of most dentists caries and gingival inflammation had never or only seldom been observed in association with GIC fillings whereas most dentists had observed these complications often in connection with composite restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9645556     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00130-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  34 in total

1.  Deterioration of coastal groundwater quality in Island and mainland regions of Ramanathapuram District, Southern India.

Authors:  Venkataramann Sivasankar; Thiagarajan Ramachandramoorthy; A Chandramohan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  R C Silva; A C C Zuanon; R R Esberard; M S M Candido; J S Machado
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Influence of 0.05% sodium fluoride solutions on microhardness of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Marcia Gabriela Klan Wilde; Carina Sinclér Delfino; Juliano Fernandes Sassi; Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bioactive sol-gel glass added ionomer cement for the regeneration of tooth structure.

Authors:  Jung-Young Choi; Hae-Hyoung Lee; Hae-Won Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  Claudio Poggio; Riccardo Beltrami; Andrea Scribante; Marco Colombo; Marco Lombardini
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-03-31

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers, Compomers and Giomers - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  P Tarasingh; J Sharada Reddy; K Suhasini; I Hemachandrika
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-07-01

7.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ruchika Bansal; Tajinder Bansal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

8.  Evaluation of Ion Release from Four Dental Sealants.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Su-Juan Zeng; Yu-Hong Li; Min-Quan Du
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-22

9.  Antibacterial Activity and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement, Compomer and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-Ionomer Cement.

Authors:  Sonia Tiwari; Mallikarjuna Kenchappa; Deepak Bhayya; Shilpi Gupta; Sudhanshu Saxena; Saurabh Satyarth; Aishwarya Singh; Manoj Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  In vitro fluoride release from a different kind of conventional and resin modified glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  Mediha Selimović-Dragaš; Lajla Hasić-Branković; Fehim Korać; Nermin Đapo; Amina Huseinbegović; Sedin Kobašlija; Meliha Lekić; Šahza Hatibović-Kofman
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.