Literature DB >> 9642005

Stabilizing and directional preferences of female Hyla ebraccata for calls differing in static properties.

.   

Abstract

Female frogs of many species show preferences for calls with particular properties. This study focuses on female preferences in Hyla ebraccata for computer-synthesized calls that differ in pulse-repetition rate or dominant frequency. Both of these call properties are static acoustic properties of advertisement calls of H. ebraccata (within-male coefficient of variation <5%). Females exerted directional selection on dominant frequency, preferring low-frequency calls (2960 Hz) to calls with the dominant frequency of the population mean (3240 Hz). Because size is negatively correlated with dominant frequency, female choice could explain size-biased mating success observed in natural populations. Females also exerted stabilizing selection on pulse-repetition rate, preferring calls with a pulse-repetition rate of the population mean (99 Hz) to calls with a pulse-repetition rate that was twice as fast (200 Hz). The results of this study show that female choice creates either directional or stabilizing selection on static properties of calls. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9642005     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  11 in total

1.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina.

Authors:  K L Shaw; D P Herlihy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Female preference for multiple condition-dependent components of a sexually selected signal.

Authors:  Hannes Scheuber; Alain Jacot; Martin W G Brinkhof
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Joy L Horovitz; Jennifer Hamilton; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evolution of advertisement calls in African clawed frogs.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Ben J Evans; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Jessica L Ward; Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Jessica L Ward; Elliot K Love; Alexander T Baugh; Noah M Gordon; Jessie C Tanner; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-08

7.  Long recording sequences: how to track the intra-individual variability of acoustic signals.

Authors:  Thierry Lengagne; Doris Gomez; Rémy Josserand; Yann Voituron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Geographic variation in the advertisement calls of Hyla eximia and its possible explanations.

Authors:  Ruth E Rodríguez-Tejeda; María Guadalupe Méndez-Cárdenas; Valentina Islas-Villanueva; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A unique mating strategy without physical contact during fertilization in Bombay Night Frogs (Nyctibatrachus humayuni) with the description of a new form of amplexus and female call.

Authors:  Bert Willaert; Robin Suyesh; Sonali Garg; Varad B Giri; Mark A Bee; S D Biju
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Multi-character perspectives on the evolution of intraspecific differentiation in a neotropical hylid frog.

Authors:  Stephen C Lougheed; James D Austin; James P Bogart; Peter T Boag; Andrew A Chek
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.