Literature DB >> 9641984

Multiple open forms of ribose-binding protein trace the path of its conformational change.

A J Björkman1, S L Mowbray.   

Abstract

Conformational changes are necessary for the function of bacterial periplasmic receptors in chemotaxis and transport. Such changes allow entry and exit of ligand, and enable the correct interaction of the ligand-bound proteins with the membrane components of each system. Three open, ligand-free forms of the Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein were observed here by X-ray crystallographic studies. They are opened by 43 degrees, 50 degrees and 64 degrees with respect to the ligand-bound protein reported previously. The three open forms are not distinct, but show a clear relationship to each other. All are the product of a similar opening motion, and are stabilized by a new, almost identical packing interface between the domains. The changes are generated by similar bond rotations, although some differences in the three hinge segments are needed to accommodate the various structural scenarios. Some local repacking also occurs as interdomain contacts are lost. The least open (43 degrees) form is probably the dominant one in solution under normal conditions, although a mixture of species seems likely. The open and closed forms have distinct surfaces in the regions known to be important in chemotaxis and transport, which will differentiate their interactions with the membrane components. It seems certain that the conformational path that links the forms described here is that followed during ligand retrieval, and in ligand release into the membrane-bound permease system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9641984     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  56 in total

1.  Plasticity of quaternary structure: twenty-two ways to form a LacI dimer.

Authors:  L Swint-Kruse; C R Elam; J W Lin; D R Wycuff; K Shive Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Construction of a fluorescent biosensor family.

Authors:  Robert M de Lorimier; J Jeff Smith; Mary A Dwyer; Loren L Looger; Kevin M Sali; Chad D Paavola; Shahir S Rizk; Shamil Sadigov; David W Conrad; Leslie Loew; Homme W Hellinga
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Computational design of a Zn2+ receptor that controls bacterial gene expression.

Authors:  M A Dwyer; L L Looger; H W Hellinga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluation of the relative stability of liganded versus ligand-free protein conformations using Simplicial Neighborhood Analysis of Protein Packing (SNAPP) method.

Authors:  Douglas B Sherman; Shuxing Zhang; J Bruce Pitner; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-09-01

5.  Probing protein mechanics: residue-level properties and their use in defining domains.

Authors:  Isabelle Navizet; Fabien Cailliez; Richard Lavery
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Optimized torsion-angle normal modes reproduce conformational changes more accurately than cartesian modes.

Authors:  Jenelle K Bray; Dahlia R Weiss; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Periplasmic domain of the sensor-kinase BvgS reveals a new paradigm for the Venus flytrap mechanism.

Authors:  Julien Herrou; Coralie Bompard; René Wintjens; Elian Dupré; Eve Willery; Vincent Villeret; Camille Locht; Rudy Antoine; Françoise Jacob-Dubuisson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conformational flexibility of the leucine binding protein examined by protein domain coarse-grained molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Iwona Siuda; Lea Thøgersen
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Conformational changes of glucose/galactose-binding protein illuminated by open, unliganded, and ultra-high-resolution ligand-bound structures.

Authors:  M Jack Borrok; Laura L Kiessling; Katrina T Forest
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Can morphing methods predict intermediate structures?

Authors:  Dahlia R Weiss; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.