Literature DB >> 9641327

Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.

C A Miller1, P J Abbas, J T Rubinstein, B K Robinson, A J Matsuoka, G Woodworth.   

Abstract

We recorded electrically evoked compound action potentials (EAPs) from guinea pigs and cats using monophasic current pulses delivered by a monopolar intracochlear electrode. By using simple stimuli, we sought results that could shed light on basic excitation properties of the auditory nerve. In these acute experiments, the recording electrode was placed directly on the auditory nerve. Responses to anodic and cathodic stimulus pulses were recorded separately to evaluate stimulus polarity effects. Several polarity-dependent properties were observed. Both EAP morphology and latency were polarity-dependent, with greater latencies for cathodic stimulation. Threshold stimulus level was also polarity-dependent, but in different directions in the two species: cats had lower cathodic thresholds while guinea pigs had lower anodic thresholds. We also observed that the slopes of the EAP amplitude-level functions depended upon stimulus polarity. In most cases where EAP saturation amplitude could be measured, that amplitude was similar for anodic and cathodic stimuli, suggesting that either stimulus polarity can recruit all fibers, or at least a comparable numbers of fibers. The common findings (e.g., EAP morphology and polarity-dependent latency) observed in these two species suggest results that can be extrapolated to responses obtained in humans, while the species-specific findings (e.g., dependence of threshold on polarity) may point to underlying anatomical differences that caution against overgeneralization across species. Some of our observations also bear upon hypotheses of how electrical stimuli may excite different sites on auditory nerve fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9641327     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00046-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  29 in total

1.  Acoustic events and "optophonic" cochlear responses induced by pulsed near-infrared laser.

Authors:  Ingo Ulrik Teudt; Hannes Maier; Claus-Peter Richter; Andrej Kral
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Ipsilateral masking between acoustic and electric stimulations.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Hamid R Djalilian; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

7.  A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

9.  Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Jacques Chatron; Stéphane Roman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-30

10.  Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods.

Authors:  E Katelyn Glassman; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.