Literature DB >> 9640721

A randomized controlled trial of telemedicine in an emergency department.

J A Brennan1, J A Kealy, L H Gerardi, R Shih, J Allegra, L Sannipoli, D Lutz.   

Abstract

A prospective study of emergency department telemedicine was carried out at two hospitals in northern New Jersey. One hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and four (85%) consented to participate, with 54 being randomized to the telemedicine group and 50 to the control group. Four patients did not complete the protocol. No significant differences were seen between the groups for: occurrence of 72 h emergency department return visits (0% vs 0%); need for additional care (2.3% vs 2.4%); positive patient-physician interaction (98% vs 100%); positive patient-nurse interaction (98% vs 98%); positive overall patient satisfaction (98% vs 95%). The average patient throughput time (time from admission to discharge) for the telemedicine group was 106 min; the average for the control group was 117 min. Telemedicine was found to be a satisfactory technique for pre-selected emergency department patients and was viewed by the physicians as an acceptable method of complementary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9640721     DOI: 10.1258/1357633981931911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  8 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine.

Authors:  F Mair; P Whitten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

2.  The safety and effectiveness of minor injuries telemedicine.

Authors:  J R Benger; S M Noble; J Coast; J M Kendall
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Electronic health services: an introduction to theory and application.

Authors:  Mounir M Khalil; Ray Jones
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 1.657

Review 4.  Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  W R Hersh; M Helfand; J Wallace; D Kraemer; P Patterson; S Shapiro; M Greenlick
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Veteran, primary care provider, and specialist satisfaction with electronic consultation.

Authors:  Keri L Rodriguez; Kelly H Burkitt; Nichole K Bayliss; Jennifer E Skoko; Galen E Switzer; Susan L Zickmund; Michael J Fine; David S Macpherson
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Follow-up for Patients With Abdominal Pain Using Video Consultation (SAVED Study): Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Dinesh Visva Gunasekeran; Zhenghong Liu; Win Jim Tan; Joshua Koh; Chiu Peng Cheong; Lay Hong Tan; Chee Siang Lau; Gaik Kheng Phuah; Newsie Donnah A Manuel; Che Chong Chia; Gek Siang Seng; Nancy Tong; May Hang Huin; Suzette Villaluna Dulce; Susan Yap; Kishanti Ponampalam; Hao Ying; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; R Ponampalam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients' and Healthcare Workers' Satisfaction.

Authors:  Jens Laigaard; Trine Ungermann Fredskild; Grzegorz Lukasz Fojecki
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 8.  Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Antoine Rachas; Andrew J Farmer; Marco Inzitari; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.