Literature DB >> 9638491

Prevalence of fecal incontinence: what can be expected?

G D Giebel1, R Lefering, H Troidl, H Blöchl.   

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a serious problem especially for the elderly. The epidemiology of incontinence is not well described in the literature although it is often used as an endpoint for treatment evaluation in clinical trials. Complete continence is often assumed to be the "normal" standard. The goals of this study were to establish detailed prevalence rates for fecal incontinence in a standard population and to identify differences due to age and sex. A questionnaire about fecal incontinence and its consequences with predefined answers was filled out anonymously by 500 volunteers. The study population was selected to meet the respective age and sex distribution of the German adult population. The data indicated that 4.8% of the persons were unable to control solid stools, while 19.6% had problems at least with one type of incontinence (solid, pasty, or lipid stools, winds). Problems with pasty or liquid stools are more frequent in women. The ability to control wind is decreased in elderly persons. The time needed to reach a toilet is shorter for women, and generally decreases in the elderly. Men more often describe soiling the underwear. Persons with signs of incontinence show decreased levels of social activities. A global incontinence rate of 5% fits well with some previously published results. Soiling of the underwear is not well suited for defining incontinence. The increased rate in women may in part be explained by morphological differences. The reduced time to hold stools especially in the elderly in combination with a reduced mobility may result in a higher rate of incontinence, which is correlated with reduced social activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9638491     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

1.  [Metabolic long-term complications after urinary diversion].

Authors:  R Stein; C Ziesel; S Frees; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Urinary diversion in childhood: special attention to the long-term consequences and complications].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients.

Authors:  Gino C Matibag; Hiroshi Nakazawa; Paolo Giamundo; Hiko Tamashiro
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Prevalence of faecal incontinence in the community: a cross-sectional study in Singapore.

Authors:  Jason Wei-Min Lim; Christian Heng; Mark Te-Ching Wong; Choong-Leong Tang
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Proctocolectomy for colorectal cancer--is the ileal pouch anal anastomosis a safe alternative to permanent ileostomy?

Authors:  Ryan Snelgrove; Carl J Brown; Brenda I O'Connor; Harden Huang; J Charles Victor; Robert Gryfe; Helen MacRae; Zane Cohen; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Clinical and psychological correlates of soiling in adult patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Michel Bouchoucha; Ghislain Devroede; Pierre Rompteaux; Bakhtiar Bejou; Jean-Marc Sabate; Robert Benamouzig
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Fecal incontinence among morbid obese women seeking for weight loss surgery: an underappreciated association with adverse impact on quality of life.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg; Mark Haney; Patrizio Petrone; Peter Crookes; Jason Rosca; Manfred Ritter; Howard S Kaufman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  [Direct sphincter repair: techniques, indications and results].

Authors:  Said Ait Laalim; Abdelmalek Hrora; Mohammed Raiss; Karim Ibnmejdoub; Imane Toughai; Mohammed Ahallat; Khalid Mazaz
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2013-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.