Literature DB >> 9637333

The role of reflection in single and double loop learning.

J Greenwood1.   

Abstract

A recent review of the literature on reflective practice in nursing indicates that approaches to its promotion in the United Kingdom and Australia appear to differ. In the United Kingdom, these approaches promote single-loop learning whereas in Australia the approaches adopted attempt to promote double-loop learning. In this paper single and double-loop learning will be defined and the limitations of single-loop learning in nurse education will be discussed. In addition, definitions of reflective practice, the purposes it is claimed to serve and a range of frameworks developed to promote its development will be reviewed. Inconsistencies between espoused purposes and suggested frameworks will be discussed. The paper will also include a description of recent initiatives implemented in Western Sydney, Australia, to foster nurses' double-loop learning.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9637333     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.t01-1-00579.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  9 in total

1.  An interdisciplinary computer-based information tool for palliative severe pain management.

Authors:  Craig E Kuziemsky; Jens H Weber-Jahnke; Francis Lau; G Michael Downing
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Learning reflexively from a health promotion professional development program in Canada.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Tremblay; Lucie Richard; Astrid Brousselle; Nicole Beaudet
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.483

3.  Critical theory and the scholarship of medical education.

Authors:  John Edward Sandars
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-29

Review 4.  Through the looking glass: a review of the literature surrounding reflective practice in dentistry.

Authors:  Faith Campbell; Helen Rogers
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.727

5.  Using a computer simulation for teaching communication skills: A blinded multisite mixed methods randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frederick W Kron; Michael D Fetters; Mark W Scerbo; Casey B White; Monica L Lypson; Miguel A Padilla; Gayle A Gliva-McConvey; Lee A Belfore; Temple West; Amelia M Wallace; Timothy C Guetterman; Lauren S Schleicher; Rebecca A Kennedy; Rajesh S Mangrulkar; James F Cleary; Stacy C Marsella; Daniel M Becker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-10-29

6.  A framework and a measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care.

Authors:  Sarah S Slaghuis; Mathilde M H Strating; Roland A Bal; Anna P Nieboer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Enhancing the use of research in health-promoting, anti-racism policy.

Authors:  Angeline S Ferdinand; Yin Paradies; Margaret Kelaher
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-07-11

8.  Differences between high- and low-achieving pre-clinical medical students: a qualitative instrumental case study from a theory of action perspective.

Authors:  Chan Choong Foong; Nur Liyana Bashir Ghouse; An Jie Lye; Vinod Pallath; Wei-Han Hong; Jamuna Vadivelu
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 4.709

9.  Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Lisa Cranley; James W Dearing; Elizabeth J Dogherty; Janet E Squires; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 7.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.