Literature DB >> 9637060

Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study.

H Honda1.   

Abstract

Based on recent experimental studies of complementary gradients of receptor density (R) on the retinal surface and ligand density (L) on the tectal surface, and mapping of the high point on the receptor gradient to the low point on the ligand and vice versa, the servomechanism model was constructed involving a mechanism for the retinal axon to reach its target automatically sensing a difference between the signal strength (R.L) and the standard value (S). Computer simulations based on the model demonstrated desired two-dimensional topographic mapping of the retinal axons on the tectum, and explained three strange behaviors of the retinal axons that had been observed in stripe assays for retinal axons using stripes composed of tectal membrane fragments: repulsive behaviors of the retinal axons by the ligand substances, uncertainty of the nasal axons whether or not they show regional selectivity between substances of anterior and posterior tecta, and abrupt transition of growth of the axons originating at continuously varied retinal positions on the stripes having graded ligand density. Finally we suggested what is to be improved in stripe assays with the artificial gradient of the tectal membrane fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9637060     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  11 in total

1.  Topological specificity in reinnervation of the superior colliculus by regenerated retinal ganglion cell axons in adult hamsters.

Authors:  Y Sauvé; H Sawai; M Rasminsky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Reading of concentration gradients by axonal growth cones.

Authors:  J Löschinger; F Weth; F Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mistargeting hippocampal axons by expression of a truncated Eph receptor.

Authors:  Yong Yue; Zhi-Yong Chen; Nick W Gale; Jan Blair-Flynn; Tian-Jing Hu; Xin Yue; Margaret Cooper; David P Crockett; George D Yancopoulos; Lino Tessarollo; Renping Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Competition is a driving force in topographic mapping.

Authors:  Jason W Triplett; Cory Pfeiffenberger; Jena Yamada; Ben K Stafford; Neal T Sweeney; Alan M Litke; Alexander Sher; Alexei A Koulakov; David A Feldheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A unifying model for activity-dependent and activity-independent mechanisms predicts complete structure of topographic maps in ephrin-A deficient mice.

Authors:  Dmitry N Tsigankov; Alexei A Koulakov
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 6.  Using theoretical models to analyse neural development.

Authors:  Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  A mathematical framework for modeling axon guidance.

Authors:  Johannes K Krottje; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  Differential withdrawal of retinal axons induced by a secreted factor.

Authors:  H Ichijo; F Bonhoeffer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Sperry versus Hebb: topographic mapping in Isl2/EphA3 mutant mice.

Authors:  Dmitry Tsigankov; Alexei A Koulakov
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA-ephrinA gradients, axon-axon interactions, and patterned activity.

Authors:  Paul A Yates; Alex D Holub; Todd McLaughlin; Terrence J Sejnowski; Dennis D M O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.