Literature DB >> 15007830

Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA-ephrinA gradients, axon-axon interactions, and patterned activity.

Paul A Yates1, Alex D Holub, Todd McLaughlin, Terrence J Sejnowski, Dennis D M O'Leary.   

Abstract

The topographic projection of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons to mouse superior colliculus (SC) or chick optic tectum (OT) is formed in three phases: RGC axons overshoot their termination zone (TZ); they exhibit interstitial branching along the axon that is topographically biased for the correct location of their future TZ; and branches arborize preferentially at the TZ and the initial exuberant projection refines through axon and branch elimination to generate a precise retinotopic map. We present a computational model of map development that demonstrates that the countergradients of EphAs and ephrinAs in retina and the OT/SC and bidirectional repellent signaling between RGC axons and OT/SC cells are sufficient to direct an initial topographic bias in RGC axon branching. Our model also suggests that a proposed repellent action of EphAs/ephrinAs present on RGC branches and arbors added to that of EphAs/ephrinAs expressed by OT/SC cells is required to progressively restrict branching and arborization to topographically correct locations and eliminate axon overshoot. Simulations show that this molecular framework alone can develop considerable topographic order and refinement, including axon elimination, a feature not programmed into the model. Generating a refined map with a condensed TZ as in vivo requires an additional parameter that enhances branch formation along an RGC axon near sites that it has a higher branch density, and resembles an assumed role for patterned neural activity. The same computational model generates the phenotypes reported in ephrinA deficient mice and Isl2-EphA3 knockin mice. This modeling suggests that gradients of counter-repellents can establish a substantial degree of topographic order in the OT/SC, and that repellents present on RGC axon branches and arbors make a substantial contribution to map refinement. However, competitive interactions between RGC axons that enhance the probability of continued local branching are required to generate precise retinotopy. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 59: 95-113, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007830      PMCID: PMC2927824          DOI: 10.1002/neu.10341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurobiol        ISSN: 0022-3034


  65 in total

1.  Topographically specific effects of ELF-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo.

Authors:  M Nakamoto; H J Cheng; G C Friedman; T McLaughlin; M J Hansen; C H Yoon; D D O'Leary; J G Flanagan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Nuk controls pathfinding of commissural axons in the mammalian central nervous system.

Authors:  M Henkemeyer; D Orioli; J T Henderson; T M Saxton; J Roder; T Pawson; R Klein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Visual projection map specified by topographic expression of transcription factors in the retina.

Authors:  J Yuasa; S Hirano; M Yamagata; M Noda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis.

Authors:  N W Gale; S J Holland; D M Valenzuela; A Flenniken; L Pan; T E Ryan; M Henkemeyer; K Strebhardt; H Hirai; D G Wilkinson; T Pawson; S Davis; G D Yancopoulos
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Eph family receptors and their ligands distribute in opposing gradients in the developing mouse retina.

Authors:  R C Marcus; N W Gale; M E Morrison; C A Mason; G D Yancopoulos
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons.

Authors:  B Monschau; C Kremoser; K Ohta; H Tanaka; T Kaneko; T Yamada; C Handwerker; M R Hornberger; J Löschinger; E B Pasquale; D A Siever; M F Verderame; B K Müller; F Bonhoeffer; U Drescher
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-03-17       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands.

Authors:  S J Holland; N W Gale; G Mbamalu; G D Yancopoulos; M Henkemeyer; T Pawson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors.

Authors:  K Brückner; E B Pasquale; R Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on optic axon branching and remodelling in vivo.

Authors:  S Cohen-Cory; S E Fraser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Chromophore-assisted laser inactivation of a repulsive axonal guidance molecule.

Authors:  B K Müller; D G Jay; F Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  31 in total

1.  Competition is a driving force in topographic mapping.

Authors:  Jason W Triplett; Cory Pfeiffenberger; Jena Yamada; Ben K Stafford; Neal T Sweeney; Alan M Litke; Alexander Sher; Alexei A Koulakov; David A Feldheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Model of the early development of thalamo-cortical connections and area patterning via signaling molecules.

Authors:  Jan Karbowski; G B Ermentrout
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  A unifying model for activity-dependent and activity-independent mechanisms predicts complete structure of topographic maps in ephrin-A deficient mice.

Authors:  Dmitry N Tsigankov; Alexei A Koulakov
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Graded ephrin-A2 expression in the developing hamster superior colliculus.

Authors:  Sherralee S Lukehurst; Carolyn E King; Lyn D Beazley; David K C Tay; Kwok-Fai So; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Axon pruning: an essential step underlying the developmental plasticity of neuronal connections.

Authors:  Lawrence K Low; Hwai-Jong Cheng
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Spontaneous discharge patterns in cochlear spiral ganglion cells before the onset of hearing in cats.

Authors:  Timothy A Jones; Patricia A Leake; Russell L Snyder; Olga Stakhovskaya; Ben Bonham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Using theoretical models to analyse neural development.

Authors:  Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  p75(NTR) mediates ephrin-A reverse signaling required for axon repulsion and mapping.

Authors:  Yoo-Shick Lim; Todd McLaughlin; Tsung-Chang Sung; Alicia Santiago; Kuo-Fen Lee; Dennis D M O'Leary
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Retinocollicular mapping explained?

Authors:  David C Sterratt; J J Johannes Hjorth
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  A multi-component model of the developing retinocollicular pathway incorporating axonal and synaptic growth.

Authors:  Keith B Godfrey; Stephen J Eglen; Nicholas V Swindale
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.