Literature DB >> 9636107

Functional specialization in auditory cortex: responses to frequency-modulated stimuli in the cat's posterior auditory field.

P Heil1, D R Irvine.   

Abstract

The mammalian auditory cortex contains multiple fields but their functional role is poorly understood. Here we examine the responses of single neurons in the posterior auditory field (P) of barbiturate- and ketamine-anesthetized cats to frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps. FM sweeps traversed the excitatory response area of the neuron under study, and FM direction and the linear rate of change of frequency (RCF) were varied systematically. In some neurons, sweeps of different sound pressure levels (SPLs) also were tested. The response magnitude (number of spikes corrected for spontaneous activity) of nearly all field P neurons varied with RCF. RCF response functions displayed a variety of shapes, but most functions were of low-pass characteristic or peaked at rather low RCFs (<100 kHz/s). Neurons with strong responses to high RCFs (high-pass or nonselective RCF response function characteristics) all displayed spike count-SPL functions to tone burst onsets that were monotonic or weakly nonmonotonic. RCF response functions and best RCFs often changed with SPL. For most neurons, FM directional sensitivity, quantified by a directional sensitivity (DS) index, also varied with RCF and SPL, but the mean and width of the distribution of DS indices across all neurons was independent of RCF. Analysis of response timing revealed that the phasic response of a neuron is triggered when the instantaneous frequency of the sweep reaches a particular value, the effective Fi. For a given neuron, values of effective Fi were independent of RCF, but depended on FM direction and SPL and were associated closely with the boundaries of the neuron's frequency versus amplitude response area. The standard deviation (SD) of the latency of the first spike of the response decreased with RCF. When SD was expressed relative to the rate of change of stimulus frequency, the resulting index of frequency jitter increased with RCF and did so rather uniformly in all neurons and largely independent of SPL. These properties suggest that many FM parameters are represented by, and may be encoded in, orderly temporal patterns across different neurons in addition to the strength of responses. When compared with neurons in primary and anterior auditory fields, field P neurons respond better to relatively slow FMs. Together with previous studies of responses to modulations of amplitude, such as tone onsets, our findings suggest more generally that field P may be best suited for processing signals that vary relatively slowly over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9636107     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  19 in total

1.  An extralemniscal component of the mustached bat inferior colliculus selective for direction and rate of linear frequency modulations.

Authors:  M Gordon; W E O'Neill
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Directional selectivity for FM sweeps in the suprageniculate nucleus of the mustached bat medial geniculate body.

Authors:  William E O'Neill; W Owen Brimijoin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reorganization in processing of spectral and temporal input in the rat posterior auditory field induced by environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  On the prediction of sweep rate and directional selectivity for FM sounds from two-tone interactions in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; William E O'Neill
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Spectral and temporal processing in rat posterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pritesh K Pandya; Daniel L Rathbun; Raluca Moucha; Navzer D Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ian A Harrington; G Christopher Stecker; Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Functional imaging of auditory cortex in adult cats using high-field fMRI.

Authors:  Trecia A Brown; Joseph S Gati; Sarah M Hughes; Pam L Nixon; Ravi S Menon; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Remodeling the cortex in memory: Increased use of a learning strategy increases the representational area of relevant acoustic cues.

Authors:  Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Patterned tone sequences reveal non-linear interactions in auditory spectrotemporal receptive fields in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; William E O'Neill
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Facilitatory mechanisms underlying selectivity for the direction and rate of frequency modulated sweeps in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.