Literature DB >> 9632871

Prospective randomized study of stress and immune response after laparoscopic vs conventional colonic resection.

C Kuntz1, A Wunsch, F Bay, J Windeler, F Glaser, C Herfarth.   

Abstract

METHODS: In order to evaluate the stress and immunological response to laparoscopic and conventional colon resection we operated on male Wistar rats (350-380 g), performing either laparoscopic (n = 15) or open colon resection (n = 15). A third group (n = 10) underwent anesthesia only. Immediately before and after surgery as well as 1 and 7 days postoperatively a 1 ml sample of blood was taken from the retrobulbar veinous plexus. Stress (corticosterone) and immune parameters (neopterin and interleukin [IL] 1-beta) were measured. Furthermore, the body weight as a parameter of postoperative recovery was monitored.
RESULTS: The analysis of variance showed significant differences between the three groups over a period of 1 week (p < 0.0001 for corticosterone, p = 0.0854 for IL 1-beta, p = 0. 0045 for neopterin). Additionally in a t-test significant differences were found between the laparoscopic and conventional group with regard to corticosterone (p = 0.08), to neopterin (p = 0. 045), and to IL 1-beta (p = 0.0043) at the end of the operation. One week after the operation the stress and immune parameters were back to normal levels in each group except IL 1-beta, but the recovery indicated by body weight was different according to the kind of the applied operative procedure: 7 days postoperatively the rats lost 5. 99% of their body weight after open surgery and only 2.4% after laparoscopic surgery. After anesthesia only the body weight increased by about 4.8%.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colon resection alters the stress and immune system of healthy rats less than open colon resection. This observation is confirmed by the quicker recovery in laparoscopically operated rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9632871     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?

Authors:  P A Seshadri; E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I is an early predictor of local infective complications after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Robert Slotwiński; Waldemar L Olszewski; Andrzej Chaber; Maciej Slodkowski; Marzanna Zaleska; Ireneusz W Krasnodebski
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open resection for middle and lower rectal cancer: an NTCLES study.

Authors:  Shaotang Li; Pan Chi; Huiming Lin; Xingrong Lu; Ying Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  I Baća; Z Perko; I Bokan; Z Mimica; A Petricević; N Druzijanić; M Situm
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Advantages of laparoscopic compared to conventional surgery are not related to an innate immune response of peritoneal immune activation: an animal study in rats.

Authors:  Philipp Lingohr; Jonas Dohmen; Hanno Matthaei; Timo Schwandt; Kathy Stein; Gun-Soo Hong; Julia Steitz; Thomas Longerich; Edwin Bölke; Sven Wehner; Jörg C Kalff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Kun Hu; Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhi-Xin Chen; Lan-Lan Wang; Yong-Yang Yu; Jin Liu; Bo Zhang; Li Li; Ye Shu; Jia-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shaotang Li; Feizhao Jiang; Jingfu Tu; Xiaofeng Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.

Authors:  F Feliciotti; M Guerrieri; A M Paganini; A De Sanctis; R Campagnacci; S Perretta; G D'Ambrosio; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic surgery induced interleukin-6 levels in serum and gut mucosa: implications of peritoneum integrity and gas factors.

Authors:  John M Luk; Peter H Tung; Kwong-Fai Wong; Kwong-Leung Chan; Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of intestinal transit recovery between laparoscopic and open surgery using a rat model.

Authors:  M Takada; S Fukumoto; T Ichihara; Y Ku; Y Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.