Literature DB >> 9631967

A national survey of emergency department chest pain centers in the United States.

R J Zalenski1, R J Rydman, S Ting, L Kampe, H P Selker.   

Abstract

Although chest pain centers are promoted as improving emergency cardiac care, no data exist on their structure and processes. This national study determines the 1995 prevalence rate for emergency department (ED)-based chest pain centers in the United States and compares organizational differences of EDs with and without such centers. A mail survey was directed to 476 EDs randomly selected from the American Hospital Association's database of metropolitan hospitals (n = 2,309); the response rate was 63%. The prevalence of chest pain centers was 22.5% (95% confidence interval 18% to 27%), which yielded a projection of 520 centers in the United States in 1995. EDs with centers had higher overall patient volumes, greater use of high-technology testing, lower treatment times for thrombolytic therapy, and more advertising (all p <0.05). Hospitals with centers had greater market competition and more beds per annual admissions, cardiac catheterization, and open heart surgery capability (all p <0.05). Logistic regression identified open heart surgery, high-admission volumes, and nonprofit status as independent predictors of hospitals having chest pain centers. Thus, chest pain centers have a moderate prevalence, offer more services and marketing efforts than standard EDs, and tend to be hosted by large nonprofit hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9631967     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00159-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  Chest pain evaluation units

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Platelet reactivity and the identification of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Chad E Darling; Alan D Michelson; Gregory A Volturo; Karin Przyklenk
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Design of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography: a multicenter randomized comparative effectiveness trial of cardiac computed tomography versus alternative triage strategies in patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong; Jerome L Fleg; Alexander Goehler; Scott Gazelle; Stephen Wiviott; Hang Lee; James E Udelson; David Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital.

Authors:  S W Goodacre; F M Morris; S Campbell; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?

Authors:  C Taylor; A Forrest-Hay; S Meek
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain.

Authors:  S Goodacre; N Calvert
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Myeloperoxidase to risk stratify emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Alex F Manini; Andrew T McAfee; Vicki E Noble; J Stephen Bohan
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-06

8.  A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; George A Wells; Allan Jaffe; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-06

9.  Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in a university hospital emergency department: an observational study.

Authors:  Ulf Ekelund; Hans-Jörgen Nilsson; Attila Frigyesi; Ole Torffvit
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2002-10-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.