Literature DB >> 9630542

A novel bacterial reversion and forward mutation assay based on green fluorescent protein.

N F Cariello1, S Narayanan, P Kwanyuen, H Muth, W M Casey.   

Abstract

We report the first use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) for mutation detection. We have constructed a plasmid-based bacterial system whereby mutated cells fluoresce and non-mutated cells do not fluoresce. Fluorescence is monitored using a simple hand-help UV lamp; no additional cofactors or manipulations are necessary. To develop a reversion system, we introduced a +1 DNA frameshift mutation in the coding region of GFP and the resulting protein is not fluorescent in Escherichia coli. Treatment of bacteria containing the +1 frameshift vector with ICR-191 yields fluorescent colonies, indicating that reversion to the wild-type sequence has occurred. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to insert an additional cytosine into a native CCC sequence in the coding region of GFP in plasmid pBAD-GFPuv, expanding the sequence to CCCC. A dose-related increase in fluorescent colonies was observed when the bacteria were treated with ICR-191, an agent that induces primarily frameshift mutations. The highest dose of ICR-191 tested, 16 microg/ml, produced a mutant fraction of 16 x 10(-5) and 8.8 x 10(-5) in duplicate experiments. The reversion system did not respond to MNNG, an agent that produces mainly single-base substitutions. To develop a forward system, we used GFP under the control of the arabinose PBAD promoter; in the absence of arabinose, GFP expression is repressed and no fluorescent colonies are observed. When cells were treated with MNNG or ENNG, a dose-dependent increase in fluorescent colonies was observed, indicating that mutations had occurred in the arabinose control region that de-repressed the promoter. Treating bacteria with 100 microg/ml MNNG induced mutant fractions as high as 82 x 10(-5) and 40 x 10-5 in duplicate experiments. Treating bacteria with 150 microg/ml ENNG induced a mutant fraction of 2.1 x 10(-5) in a single experiment. Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9630542     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(98)00043-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  4 in total

Review 1.  Sorting out mutation rates.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An experimental solution for the Luria-Delbrück fluctuation problem in measuring hypermutation rates.

Authors:  J Bachl; M Dessing; C Olsson; R C von Borstel; C Steinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Role of mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development.

Authors:  Tim C R Conibear; Samuel L Collins; Jeremy S Webb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.