Literature DB >> 9628745

Induction of relational schemas: common processes in reasoning and complex learning.

G S Halford1, J D Bain, M T Maybery, G Andrews.   

Abstract

Five experiments were performed to test whether participants induced a coherent representation of the structure of a task, called a relational schema, from specific instances. Properties of a relational schema include: An explicit symbol for a relation, a binding that preserves the truth of a relation, potential for higher-order relations, omnidirectional access, potential for transfer between isomorphs, and ability to predict unseen items in isomorphic problems. However relational schemas are not necessarily coded in abstract form. Predictions from relational schema theory were contrasted with predictions from configural learning and other nonstructural theories in five experiments in which participants were taught a structure comprised of a set of initial-state,operator-->end-state instances. The initial-state,operator pairs were presented and participants had to predict the correct end-state. Induction of a relational schema was achieved efficiently by adult participants as indicated by ability to predict items of a new isomorphic problem. The relational schemas induced showed the omnidirectional access property, there was efficient transfer to isomorphs, and structural coherence had a powerful effect on learning. The "learning to learn" effect traditionally associated with the learning set literature was observed, and the long-standing enigma of learning set acquisition is explained by a model composed of relational schema induction and structure mapping. Performance was better after reversal of operators than after shift to an alternate structure, even though the latter entailed more overlap with previously learned tasks in terms of the number of configural associations that were preserved. An explanation for the reversal shift phenomenon in terms of induction and mapping of a relational schema is proposed. The five experiments provided evidence supporting predictions from relational schema theory, and no evidence was found for configural or nonstructural learning theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628745     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Structural learning in feedforward and feedback control.

Authors:  Nada Yousif; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  On aims and methods in the neuroimaging of derived relations.

Authors:  David W Dickins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Taking the Relational Structure of Fractions Seriously: Relational Reasoning Predicts Fraction Knowledge in Elementary School Children.

Authors:  Priya B Kalra; Edward M Hubbard; Percival G Matthews
Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol       Date:  2020-07-15

4.  Categorial compositionality: a category theory explanation for the systematicity of human cognition.

Authors:  Steven Phillips; William H Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Facilitation of learning induced by both random and gradual visuomotor task variation.

Authors:  Edward J A Turnham; Daniel A Braun; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction.

Authors:  Steven Phillips
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Model averaging, optimal inference, and habit formation.

Authors:  Thomas H B FitzGerald; Raymond J Dolan; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Systematicity and a Categorical Theory of Cognitive Architecture: Universal Construction in Context.

Authors:  Steven Phillips; William H Wilson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-29

10.  Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models.

Authors:  Shirley Mark; Rani Moran; Thomas Parr; Steve W Kennerley; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.