Literature DB >> 9628480

The structure of PurR mutant L54M shows an alternative route to DNA kinking.

D N Arvidson1, F Lu, C Faber, H Zalkin, R G Brennan.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the purine repressor mutant L54M bound to hypoxanthine and to the purF operator provides a stereochemical understanding of the high DNA affinity of this hinge helix mutant. Comparison of the PurR L54M-DNA complex to that of the wild type PurR-DNA complex reveals that these purine repressors bind and kink DNA similarly despite significant differences in their minor groove contacts and routes to interdigitation of the central C.G:G.C base pair step. Modeling studies, supported by genetic and biochemical data, show that the stereochemistry of the backbone atoms of the abutting hinge helices combined with the rigidity of the kinked base pair step constrain the interdigitating residue to leucine or methionine for the LacI/GalR family of transcription regulators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628480     DOI: 10.1038/nsb0698-436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Biol        ISSN: 1072-8368


  9 in total

1.  Fine-tuning function: correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse; Christopher Larson; B Montgomery Pettitt; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Structure-function relationships in human testis-determining factor SRY: an aromatic buttress underlies the specific DNA-bending surface of a high mobility group (HMG) box.

Authors:  Joseph D Racca; Yen-Shan Chen; James D Maloy; Nalinda Wickramasinghe; Nelson B Phillips; Michael A Weiss
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Functionally important positions can comprise the majority of a protein's architecture.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Daniel J Parente; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-03-04

4.  Comparing the functional roles of nonconserved sequence positions in homologous transcription repressors: implications for sequence/function analyses.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Sarah Meinhardt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Use of structural DNA properties for the prediction of transcription-factor binding sites in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Pieter Meysman; Thanh Hai Dang; Kris Laukens; Riet De Smet; Yan Wu; Kathleen Marchal; Kristof Engelen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Rheostats and toggle switches for modulating protein function.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Michael W Manley; Daniel J Parente; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lactose repressor hinge domain independently binds DNA.

Authors:  Joseph S Xu; Madeleine N Hewitt; Jaskeerat S Gulati; Matthew A Cruz; Hongli Zhan; Shirley Liu; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Predicting transcription factor specificity with all-atom models.

Authors:  Sahand Jamal Rahi; Peter Virnau; Leonid A Mirny; Mehran Kardar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Data on publications, structural analyses, and queries used to build and utilize the AlloRep database.

Authors:  Filipa L Sousa; Daniel J Parente; Jacob A Hessman; Allen Chazelle; Sarah A Teichmann; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-07-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.