Literature DB >> 9627232

Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall-up versus canal wall-down mastoidectomy.

K R Whittemore1, S N Merchant, J J Rosowski.   

Abstract

The contribution of the middle ear air spaces to sound transmission through the middle ear in canal wall-up and canal wall-down mastoidectomy was studied in human temporal bones by measurements of middle ear input impedance and sound pressure difference across the tympanic membrane for the frequency range 50 Hz to 5 kHz. These measurements indicate that, relative to canal wall-up procedures, canal wall-down mastoidectomy results in a 1 to 5 dB decrease in middle ear sound transmission below 1 kHz, a 0 to 10 dB increase between 1 and 3 kHz, and no change above 3 kHz. These results are consistent with those reported by Gyo et al. (Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:1262-8), in which umbo displacement was used as a measure of sound transmission. A model analysis suggests that the reduction in sound transmission below 1 kHz can be explained by the smaller middle ear air space volume associated with the canal wall-down procedure. We conclude that as long as the middle ear air space is aerated and has a volume greater than 0.7 ml, canal wall-down mastoidectomy should generally cause less than 10 dB changes in middle ear sound transmission relative to the canal wall-up procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627232     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70264-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

1.  Five-year postoperative outcomes of modified staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for primary acquired cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Masahiro Komori; Naoaki Yanagihara; Jun Hyodo; Ryosei Minoda; Yasuyuki Hinohira
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Evaluation of using Bioglass® in obliteration of mastoid cavity.

Authors:  Abdelrahman E M Ezzat; Mustafa I Eid
Journal:  Curr Sci Int       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

3.  Audiological Results of Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis with Cartilage Shoe Technique.

Authors:  Hacı Kaplankıran; Mehmet Emrah Ceylan; Gökçe Aksoy Yıldırım; Gözde Ceylan; Abdullah Dalğıç; Levent Olgun
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 4.  Silastic sheeting in staged ear surgery: Is there still a role for this procedure?

Authors:  Martin Müller; Flurin Honegger; Mihael Podvinec; Frank Metternich; Nicolas Gürtler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Mastoid obliteration with silicone blocks after canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Sung Woo Cho; Yong-Bum Cho; Hyong-Ho Cho
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Hearing Outcomes According to the Types of Mastoidectomy: A Comparison between Canal Wall Up and Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Min-Beom Kim; Jeesun Choi; Jae Kwon Lee; Ju-Yeon Park; Hosuk Chu; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong; Won-Ho Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Donor-site morbidity following minimally invasive costal cartilage harvest technique.

Authors:  Hyung Chae Yang; Hyong-Ho Cho; Si Young Jo; Chul Ho Jang; Yong Beom Cho
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  The effects of a canalplasty and a canal wall reconstruction on perceived sound quality: preliminary results.

Authors:  E van Spronsen; P Brienesse; F A Ebbens; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma.

Authors:  David L Choi; Michael K Gupta; Ryan Rebello; Jason D Archibald
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.