Literature DB >> 9627067

The study of the effectiveness of chest compressions using the CPR-plus.

C Elding1, P Baskett, A Hughes.   

Abstract

Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires a high level of skill from both healthcare professionals and the lay public. Inadequate chest compressions are a common cause of ineffective CPR. The CPR-plus is a non-invasive, hand-held, simple to use CPR adjunct designed to assist the rescuer to monitor and modify the compression technique during CPR, hopefully resulting in improved rescuer performance and more effective CPR. Forty qualified nurses were evaluated while they performed chest compressions on a training manikin. During simulated two-rescuer CPR (compression/ventilation ratio 5:1) the participants performed 150 compressions at a rate of 80-100 min. Compressions were performed with and without the CPR-plus and the results compared. The use of the CPR-plus was randomised with regard to whether the adjunct or the standard method was used first. The average number of correctly applied compressions was significantly better when the CPR-plus was used: 138.35/150 versus 110.70/150 (p = 0.0001). Improvements in techniques associated with the use of the CPR-plus also included a reduction in excessive application of pressure and incorrect hand position. The device provided reassurance of satisfactory compressions and an indication of impending fatigue in the rescuer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627067     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00016-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

1.  External chest compressions using a mechanical feedback device : cross-over simulation study.

Authors:  M Skorning; M Derwall; J C Brokmann; D Rörtgen; S Bergrath; J Pflipsen; S Beuerlein; R Rossaint; S K Beckers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Evaluation of a newly developed media-supported 4-step approach for basic life support training.

Authors:  Saša Sopka; Henning Biermann; Rolf Rossaint; Sebastian Knott; Max Skorning; Jörg C Brokmann; Nicole Heussen; Stefan K Beckers
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Real-Time Visual Feedback Device Improves Quality Of Chest Compressions: A Manikin Study.

Authors:  João B Augusto; Miguel B Santos; Daniel Faria; Paulo Alves; David Roque; José Morais; Victor Gil; Carlos Morais
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2020-07

5.  A new method for feedback on the quality of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Digna M González-Otero; Jesus Ruiz; Sofía Ruiz de Gauna; Unai Irusta; Unai Ayala; Erik Alonso
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Effect of the Cardio First Angel™ device on CPR indices: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili; Ali Amirsavadkouhi; Hamidreza Jamaati; Morteza Izadi; Seyed J Madani; Seyed M R Hashemian; Andrew C Miller
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.