| Literature DB >> 25243189 |
Digna M González-Otero1, Jesus Ruiz1, Sofía Ruiz de Gauna1, Unai Irusta1, Unai Ayala1, Erik Alonso1.
Abstract
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves through the use of CPR feedback devices. Most feedback devices integrate the acceleration twice to estimate compression depth. However, they use additional sensors or processing techniques to compensate for large displacement drifts caused by integration. This study introduces an accelerometer-based method that avoids integration by using spectral techniques on short duration acceleration intervals. We used a manikin placed on a hard surface, a sternal triaxial accelerometer, and a photoelectric distance sensor (gold standard). Twenty volunteers provided 60 s of continuous compressions to test various rates (80-140 min(-1)), depths (3-5 cm), and accelerometer misalignment conditions. A total of 320 records with 35312 compressions were analysed. The global root-mean-square errors in rate and depth were below 1.5 min(-1) and 2 mm for analysis intervals between 2 and 5 s. For 3 s analysis intervals the 95% levels of agreement between the method and the gold standard were within -1.64-1.67 min(-1) and -1.69-1.72 mm, respectively. Accurate feedback on chest compression rate and depth is feasible applying spectral techniques to the acceleration. The method avoids additional techniques to compensate for the integration displacement drift, improving accuracy, and simplifying current accelerometer-based devices.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25243189 PMCID: PMC4163344 DOI: 10.1155/2014/865967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Positioning of the accelerometer within the enclosure for the regular and tilt sessions. During each recording the enclosure was kept fixed to the manikin's chest.
Figure 2Block diagram of the spectral method for feedback on rate and depth.
Median values (5/95 percentile in parenthesis) of the mean rate and depth per record for the regular and tilt sessions with T = 3 s. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the values obtained from the gold standard (CD signal) and the acceleration (accel. signal). No significant difference was observed for any of the CPR target conditions.
| Target | Regular session | Tilt session | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD signal | Accel. signal | CD signal | Accel. signal | |
| Ratea | ||||
| 80 min−1 | 80.8 (77.4–84.8) | 80.9 (77.5–84.9) | 80.2 (77.5–83.6) | 80.3 (77.7–83.6) |
| 100 min−1 | 100.1 (97.5–102.2) | 100.0 (97.4–102.3) | 100.3 (96.5–105.1) | 100.1 (96.2–105.3) |
| 120 min−1 | 120.5 (117.4–123.8) | 120.4 (117.6–123.9) | 120.2 (116.9–123.7) | 120.3 (116.9–124.0) |
| 140 min−1 | 140.1 (134.4–142.0) | 140.2 (134.8–142.1) | 140.2 (135.1–143.4) | 140.1 (135.3–143.2) |
| Depthb | ||||
| 30 mm | 30.4 (27.7–33.3) | 30.3 (27.0–33.5) | 29.7 (27.5–32.6) | 29.7 (27.0–33.2) |
| 50 mm | 50.1 (45.4–54.1) | 50.1 (45.6–54.9) | 52.3 (49.1–55.1) | 52.5 (49.1–57.0) |
a40 records per session, b80 records per session.
Figure 3Root-mean-square error (RMSE) in mean rate and depth as a function of the duration of the analysis interval for the regular session and the tilt session.
Figure 4Bland-Altman plots of the errors plotted against the gold standard (from the photoelectric sensor), for the regular (a) and tilt (b) sessions. The 95% levels of agreement are indicated in text and by horizontal lines.