Literature DB >> 9623897

Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.

T F Flemmig1, G J Petersilka, A Mehl, R Hickel, B Klaiber.   

Abstract

This study assessed defect depth and volume resulting from root instrumentation using a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler with a slim scaling tip (P 12) in vitro. Combinations of the following working parameters were analyzed: lateral forces of 0.5 N, 1 N, and 2 N; tip angulations of 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees; power settings of low, medium, and high; and instrumentation time of 10, 20, 40, and 80 seconds. Defects were quantified using a 3-dimensional optical laser scanner. Lateral force had the greatest influence on defect volume compared to tip angulation and power setting (beta-weights 0.53+/-0.04, 0.17+/-0.04, and 0.19+/-0.04, respectively). Lateral force and tip angulation had similar effects on defect depth, but both effects were greater compared to power setting (beta-weights 0.43+/-0.04, 0.49+/-0.04, and 0.19+/-0.04, respectively). The various combinations of the assessed working parameters showed synergistic effects resulting in a wide range of defect depths (14.1+/-1.7 microm to 410.5+/-51.1 microm) and volumes (0.0084+/-0.0057 mm3 to 1.3+/-0.079 mm3). Severe root damage (defect depth >50 microm) at 40 seconds instrumentation time occurred under most combinations of lateral force, angulation, and power settings. The only exceptions were combinations of: 1) 0 degrees angulation, 0.5 N and 1 N lateral force at any power setting and 2) 45 degrees angulation, 0.5 N lateral force at low and medium power setting. The efficacy of the assessed magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler may be adapted to the various clinical needs by adjusting the lateral force, tip angulation, and power setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9623897     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  13 in total

1.  Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Patrick Obeid; Pierre Bercy
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of the Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, Ultrasonic Scaler and Curette on Root Surface Profile Using Surface Analyser and Scanning Electron Microscope: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Shipra Arora; Arundeep Kaur Lamba; Farrukh Faraz; Shruti Tandon; Abdul Ahad
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-27

3.  Use of a continual sweep motion to compare air polishing devices, powders and exposure time on unexposed root cementum.

Authors:  Mandy L Herr; Ralph DeLong; Yuping Li; Scott A Lunos; Jill L Stoltenberg
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal.

Authors:  Stefanie J Gartenmann; Thomas Thurnheer; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.

Authors:  Kathrin Lampe Bless; Beatrice Sener; Jürg Dual; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Application of ultrasound in periodontics: Part II.

Authors:  Vivek K Bains; Ranjana Mohan; Rhythm Bains
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2008-09

7.  Piezoosteotomy in orthognathic surgery versus conventional saw and chisel osteotomy.

Authors:  C A Landes; S Stübinger; A Ballon; R Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09

8.  A comparison of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling devices: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hojatollah Yousefimanesh; Maryam Robati; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Reza Molla
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.

Authors:  Bahar Füsun Oduncuoğlu; Kıvanç Yamanel; Zahire Şahinoğlu Koçak
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01

10.  The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.

Authors:  Fabia Profili; Scilla Sparabombe; Andrew Tawse Smith; Orlando D'Isidoro; Alessandro Quaranta
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.