Literature DB >> 32284897

In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.

Bahar Füsun Oduncuoğlu1, Kıvanç Yamanel1, Zahire Şahinoğlu Koçak2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sonic and ultrasonic instrumentations generate vibrations that may influence debonding characteristics. The objective of this in vitro study was to assess the direct and indirect effects of sonic and ultrasonic periodontal instrumentations on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of metallic orthodontic brackets.
METHODS: Metallic brackets were bonded to 75 extracted mandibular central incisors that were embedded in acrylic resin. Instrumentations around the bracket base performed with ultrasonic (UltrasonicB group, n=15) and sonic (SonicB group, n=15) scalers were used to evaluate the direct effects on the SBS of brackets. Lingual surface instrumentations with ultrasonic (UltrasonicL group, n=15) and sonic (SonicL group, n=15) scalers were performed to assess the indirect effects. The control group (n=15) did not have any treatment. Instrumentations were performed for 30 s with 0° scaler tip angulations with settings recommended by manufacturers. The SBS of the brackets tested with a universal testing machine and ARI scores were recorded. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
RESULTS: The mean SBS of the control group was significantly higher than that of the UltrasonicB and SonicB groups (p=0.008). The UltrasonicL and SonicL group instrumentations also decreased the SBS, although the difference was statistically insignificant. UltrasonicB instrumentations caused significantly higher frequency of ARI scores than the control group.
CONCLUSION: The decrease of the SBS of metallic brackets indicates the influence of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentations on the breakage behavior at the bracket-resin interface. Instrumentations around the bracket base should be conducted with caution to decrease the bond failure risk of metallic brackets. © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Orthodontic Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasonics; dental bonding; dental prophylaxis; orthodontic brackets; periodontics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32284897      PMCID: PMC7138238          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  29 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial effects of mechanical debridement.

Authors:  Gregor J Petersilka; Benjamin Ehmke; Thomas F Flemmig
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications.

Authors:  S E Bishara; T S Trulove
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 3.  Ultrasound in dentistry. Part 1--Biophysical interactions.

Authors:  W R Laird; A D Walmsley
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients.

Authors:  Hakan Türkkahraman; M Ozgür Sayin; F Yeşim Bozkurt; Zuhal Yetkin; Selçuk Kaya; Süleyman Onal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Displacement amplitude of ultrasonic scaler inserts.

Authors:  S C Lea; G Landini; A D Walmsley
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 6.  The effects of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health: a systematic review of controlled evidence.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Bollen; Joana Cunha-Cruz; Daniel W Bakko; Greg J Huang; Philippe P Hujoel
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics.

Authors:  Amy E Richter; Airton O Arruda; Mathilde C Peters; Woosung Sohn
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Histomorphometric study of alveolar bone turnover in orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  G J King; S D Keeling; T J Wronski
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.

Authors:  Gregor J Petersilka; Miriam Draenert; Albert Mehl; Reinhard Hickel; Thomas F Flemmig
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 10.  The influence of orthodontic fixed appliances on the oral microbiota: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amanda Osório Ayres Freitas; Mariana Marquezan; Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves Nojima; Daniela Sales Alviano; Lucianne Cople Maia
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr
View more
  1 in total

1.  Shear Bond Strength and Mode of Failure of Polypropylene Fibers in Orthodontic Flash-Free Adhesive.

Authors:  Kitiporn Chaimaungchuen; Apiwat Riddhabhaya; Nattisa Niyomtham; Irin Sirisoontorn
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.