Literature DB >> 9623822

A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions.

K T Paige1, J Bostwick, J T Bried, G Jones.   

Abstract

A large series of women who had undergone bilateral, pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions were compared with women who had had unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap procedures to determine whether a bilateral TRAM flap breast reconstruction had significant additional morbidity. The records of all women who underwent either a bilateral or unilateral pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction through the Emory Clinic from 1987 to 1994 (n = 257) were retrospectively analyzed with respect to general, breast (fat necrosis, flap loss, and cellulitis), and abdominal (hernia, skin loss, and cellulitis) complications. By using logistic regression, risk factors for these complications were determined. The incidence of fat necrosis and partial flap loss was not significantly different among bilateral patients compared with patients with unilateral TRAM reconstructions (10.0 percent versus 12.6 percent, p = 0.64 and 3.8 percent versus 5.5 percent, p = 0.74, respectively). The rate of hernia formation in the bilateral TRAM flap patients (5.4 percent) was similar to that of unilateral patients (3.9 percent, p = 0.80). Significant factors for any complication in both patient populations included obesity, smoking, and prior irradiation. The type of breast reconstruction was not a significant factor for any breast or donor-site complication. A bilateral TRAM reconstruction showed a weak association with general complications. Review of the Emory Clinic experience with unilateral and bilateral pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions from 1987 to 1994 was able to detect no significant additional rate of complications for bilateral pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions compared with unilateral unipedicled TRAM flap procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9623822     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199806000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Trends in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Lengthening the pedicle of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of upper chest and neck defects.

Authors:  J Q Zhang; J M Zhang; W Q Liang; C Y Ji; Y H Chen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  History of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodore W Uroskie; Lawrence B Colen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Atsushi Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Factors associated with hernia and bulge formation at the donor site of the pedicled TRAM flap.

Authors:  Luis Antonio Rossetto; Luiz Eduardo Felipe Abla; Ronaldo Vidal; Elvio Bueno Garcia; Ricardo João Gonzalez; Luiz Henrique Gebrim; Miguel Sabino Neto; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2010-04-07

6.  Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score.

Authors:  John Y S Kim; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Keith M Hume; Christopher J Simmons; Michael J Weiss; Robert X Murphy; Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-06-05

Review 7.  Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Stuart A Robertson; Johann A Jeevaratnam; Avi Agrawal; Ramsey I Cutress
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-13

8.  Technique for Minimizing Donor-site Morbidity after Pedicled TRAM-Flap Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes by a Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Mario Rietjens; Francesca De Lorenzi; Manconi Andrea; Jean-Yves Petit; Prakasit Chirappapha; Alaa Hamza; Stefano Martella; Benedetta Barbieri; Alessandra Gottardi; Lomeo Giuseppe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-03

Review 9.  Is obesity a predisposing factor for free flap failure and complications? Comparison between breast and nonbreast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Nae-Ho Lee; Kyung-Moo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheming Cao; Jiri Cao; Xiaoyang Pang; Wei Du; Panfeng Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.