PURPOSE: To develop a systematic method for identifying and grading age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) in human donor eyes, postmortem fundus appearance was compared with histopathologic assessment in eyes with a spectrum of age-related macular change. METHODS: Eyes without grossly visible, late ARMD were obtained from 8 cancer patients and 26 donors older than 50 years. Postmortem fundus appearance was graded for drusen and pigmentary change, using stereo color photographs. Eyes were processed and sectioned at 1 microm for histopathologic evaluation of macular retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch's membrane complex. The histologic diagnosis was compared with gross fundus appearance, clinical ophthalmic histories (n = 25), and clinical fundus photographs that were graded using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System (n = 5). RESULTS: Ten eyes met histopathologic criteria for early ARMD. A similar proportion of eyes (27%-32%) was identified as affected by ARMD by other published histopathologic criteria. By choosing eyes with at least one druse larger than 125 microm in diameter or an area of pigment-clumping 500 microm in diameter that was visible in the postmortem fundus, ARMD cases were identified with 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Alabama ARMD Grading System permits rational and standardized use of donor eyes in studies that are directed toward understanding the pathogenesis of ARMD.
PURPOSE: To develop a systematic method for identifying and grading age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) in humandonor eyes, postmortem fundus appearance was compared with histopathologic assessment in eyes with a spectrum of age-related macular change. METHODS: Eyes without grossly visible, late ARMD were obtained from 8 cancerpatients and 26 donors older than 50 years. Postmortem fundus appearance was graded for drusen and pigmentary change, using stereo color photographs. Eyes were processed and sectioned at 1 microm for histopathologic evaluation of macular retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch's membrane complex. The histologic diagnosis was compared with gross fundus appearance, clinical ophthalmic histories (n = 25), and clinical fundus photographs that were graded using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System (n = 5). RESULTS: Ten eyes met histopathologic criteria for early ARMD. A similar proportion of eyes (27%-32%) was identified as affected by ARMD by other published histopathologic criteria. By choosing eyes with at least one druse larger than 125 microm in diameter or an area of pigment-clumping 500 microm in diameter that was visible in the postmortem fundus, ARMD cases were identified with 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Alabama ARMD Grading System permits rational and standardized use of donor eyes in studies that are directed toward understanding the pathogenesis of ARMD.
Authors: A D Marmorstein; L Y Marmorstein; M Rayborn; X Wang; J G Hollyfield; K Petrukhin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-11-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Trieschmann; G Spital; A Lommatzsch; E van Kuijk; F Fitzke; A C Bird; D Pauleikhoff Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2003-11-14 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner Journal: J Vis Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Claudine E Pang; Jeffrey D Messinger; Emma C Zanzottera; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mark E Clark; Gerald McGwin; David Neely; Richard Feist; John O Mason; Martin Thomley; Milton F White; Bunyamin Ozaydin; Christopher A Girkin; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Martin Rudolf; Mark E Clark; Melissa F Chimento; Chuan-Ming Li; Nancy E Medeiros; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lifeng Tian; Krista L Kazmierkiewicz; Anita S Bowman; Mingyao Li; Christine A Curcio; Dwight E Stambolian Journal: Genomics Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam; Jeffrey D Messinger; Kenneth R Sloan; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yuko Yamada; Kazuko Ishibashi; Kazuki Ishibashi; Imran A Bhutto; Jane Tian; Gerard A Lutty; James T Handa Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 3.467