Literature DB >> 9618319

Human variability and noncancer risk assessment- An analysis of the default uncertainty factor

.   

Abstract

A 10-fold uncertainty factor is used for noncancer risk assessments to allow for possible interindividual differences between humans in the fate of the chemical in the body (kinetics) and target organ sensitivity (dynamics). Analysis of a database on the variability in each of these aspects is consistent with an even subdivision of the 10-fold factor into 10(0.5) (3.16) for kinetics and 10(0.5) (3.16) for dynamics. Analysis of the number of subjects in a normally and log-normally distributed population which would not be covered by factors of 3.16 supports this subdivision and also the use of a 10-fold factor to allow for both aspects. Analysis of kinetic data for subgroups of the population indicates that the standard default value of 3.16 for kinetics will not be adequate for all routes of elimination and all groups of the population. A scheme is proposed which would allow the selection of appropriate default uncertainty factors based on knowledge of the biological fate and effects of the chemical under review. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9618319     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  11 in total

1.  Methods for evaluating variability in human health dose-response characterization.

Authors:  Daniel A Axelrad; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas F Bateson; Michael DeVito; Rebecca C Dzubow; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Alicia M Frame; Karen A Hogan; Keith Houck; Michael Stewart
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 2.  Assessing health risks from multiple environmental stressors: Moving from G×E to I×E.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Gwendolyn Osborne; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Andrew G Salmon; Martha S Sandy; Gina Solomon; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.657

3.  Extreme sensitivity and the practical implications of risk assessment thresholds.

Authors:  John Bukowski; Mark Nicolich; R Jeffrey Lewis
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Modeling the Human Kinetic Adjustment Factor for Inhaled Volatile Organic Chemicals: Whole Population Approach versus Distinct Subpopulation Approach.

Authors:  M Valcke; A Nong; K Krishnan
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-03-07

5.  Systems Biology and Biomarkers of Early Effects for Occupational Exposure Limit Setting.

Authors:  D Gayle DeBord; Lyle Burgoon; Stephen W Edwards; Lynne T Haber; M Helen Kanitz; Eileen Kuempel; Russell S Thomas; Berran Yucesoy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits.

Authors:  D A Dankovic; B D Naumann; A Maier; M L Dourson; L S Levy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Pediatric Safety of Polysorbates in Drug Formulations.

Authors:  Christina Kriegel; Matthias Festag; Ravuri S K Kishore; Dieter Roethlisberger; Georg Schmitt
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20

Review 8.  Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Authors:  Olwenn V Martin; Scholze Martin; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  Advancing human health risk assessment: integrating recent advisory committee recommendations.

Authors:  Michael Dourson; Richard A Becker; Lynne T Haber; Lynn H Pottenger; Tiffany Bredfeldt; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  PBPK-Based Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Total Chlorotriazines in Drinking Water.

Authors:  Charles B Breckenridge; Jerry L Campbell; Harvey J Clewell; Melvin E Andersen; Ciriaco Valdez-Flores; Robert L Sielken
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.