Literature DB >> 9616279

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in patients with gastric carcinoma.

J D Hayden1, L Cawkwell, P Quirke, M F Dixon, A R Goldstone, H Sue-Ling, D Johnston, I G Martin.   

Abstract

A proportion of gastric adenocarcinomas exhibit replication errors manifested as microsatellite instability. The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of this abnormality remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the importance of microsatellite instability by analysing a large series of gastric carcinomas from an English population. Using a novel fluorescent polymerase chain reaction technique, we amplified 11 microsatellite sequences from paired normal and carcinoma DNA from 101 patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Overall, 21% of cases demonstrated microsatellite instability in at least one locus. At least four loci were examined in each case. A replication error positive phenotype (minimum of 29% of loci affected) was detected in 9% of cases. There was no statistically significant association between the presence of microsatellite instability or replication error positive phenotype and the patient's age, sex, tumour site, stage, node status, histological subtype or grade. Carcinomas confined to the mucosa or submucosa (T1) showed a significantly higher frequency of instability and replication error positive phenotypes than T3 lesions (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05, respectively). A larger proportion of patients who were microsatellite instability or replication error positive were alive at 5 years compared with those who were negative but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.15 and P = 0.16, respectively). We identified a subset of gastric carcinomas from a relatively low-risk population which showed evidence of microsatellite instability. There were no statistically significant 5-year survival advantages in cases demonstrating microsatellite instability or replication error positive phenotypes. The detection of microsatellite instability is of limited prognostic value in gastric carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9616279     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00343-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

1.  Microsatellite instability is associated with a better prognosis for gastric cancer patients after curative surgery.

Authors:  Wen-Liang Fang; Shih-Ching Chang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Kuo-Hung Huang; Jen-Hao Chen; Su-Shun Lo; Mao-Chih Hsieh; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Chew-Wun Wu; Shih-Hwa Chiou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Origin of microsatellite instability in gastric cancer.

Authors:  K C Halling; J Harper; C A Moskaluk; S N Thibodeau; G R Petroni; A S Yustein; P Tosi; C Minacci; F Roviello; P Piva; S R Hamilton; C E Jackson; S M Powell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Microsatellite instability and survival in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Zhu; Zhi Li; Yan Wang; Chenlu Zhang; Yunpeng Liu; Xiujuan Qu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 4.  Genomic and genetic alterations influence the progression of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Stefania Nobili; Lorenzo Bruno; Ida Landini; Cristina Napoli; Paolo Bechi; Francesco Tonelli; Carlos A Rubio; Enrico Mini; Gabriella Nesi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Tumor microsatellite instability in early onset gastric cancer.

Authors:  Julinor Bacani; Rhonda Zwingerman; Nando Di Nicola; Samantha Spencer; Trish Wegrynowski; Kyle Mitchell; Kazuko Hay; Mark Redston; Eric Holowaty; David Huntsman; Aaron Pollett; Robert Riddell; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  High-risk and low-risk gastric cancer areas in Italy and its association with microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Karol Polom; Daniele Marrelli; Valeria Pascale; Giandomenico Roviello; Costantino Voglino; Henry Rho; Carla Vindigni; Mario Marini; Raffaele Macchiarelli; Franco Roviello
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Allelic imbalance of 8p indicates poor survival in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Amy J French; Gina Petroni; Stephen N Thibideau; Mark Smolkin; Eric Bissonette; Franco Roviello; Jeffrey C Harper; Benjamin R Koch; Sarah A Anderson; Scott J Hebbring; Steven M Powell
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 8.  The clinicopathological features of gastric carcinomas with microsatellite instability may be mediated by mutations of different "target genes": a study of the TGFbeta RII, IGFII R, and BAX genes.

Authors:  C Oliveira; R Seruca; M Seixas; M Sobrinho-Simões
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Microsatellite instability is associated with the clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer in sporadic gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Shin Hyuk Kim; Byung Kyu Ahn; Young Su Nam; Joo Youn Pyo; Young Ha Oh; Kang Hong Lee
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Kunitoshi Shigeyasu; Takeshi Nagasaka; Yoshiko Mori; Naosuke Yokomichi; Takashi Kawai; Tomokazu Fuji; Keisuke Kimura; Yuzo Umeda; Shunsuke Kagawa; Ajay Goel; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.