Literature DB >> 9616242

Comparison of radiation dose from intravenous urography and 99Tcm DMSA scintigraphy in children.

T Smith1, I Gordon, J P Kelly.   

Abstract

Intravenous urography (i.v.u.) and 99Tcm DMSA scintigraphy are possible alternative diagnostic techniques in paediatric renal investigation. Radiation dose comparisons between them have been complicated in the past by the lack of paediatric data. In this study, evaluations relevant to children are used to compare estimates of effective dose from the two techniques. For the radiographic procedures, standard operating parameters and representative age-dependent values of entrance surface dose were established from recent literature. Conversion factors relating effective dose to entrance surface dose and dose-area product are presented and used to obtain values of effective dose for single radiographs of abdomen, kidneys and pelvis. Suggested i.v.u. procedures consisting of four ("minimum") or eight ("average") radiographs were adopted to derive the effective dose for full i.v.u. examinations. 99Tcm DMSA dose estimates, taken from our published work using an administered activity schedule based on body surface area, are almost constant at about 1 mSv for all children. In comparison, mean i.v.u. doses based on the "average" number of radiographs are similar to DMSA doses for infants (< 1 year) but may be twice as high for older children. Although the differences between procedures at this level of dose do not in themselves provide grounds for preference, when coupled with the lower diagnostic sensitivity of i.v.u. they suggest limitations of this procedure for detection of a renal scar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9616242     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.843.9616242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  2 in total

1.  Paediatric urological investigations--dose comparison between urology-related and CT irradiation.

Authors:  Mark Page; Cosmin Florescu; Lilian Johnstone; Daniel Habteslassie; Michael Ditchfield
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-02-05

2.  Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations.

Authors:  Jan Persliden; Ebba Helmrot; Per Hjort; Margareta Resjö
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.