Literature DB >> 9615139

[Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis].

P Guigui1, P Lambert, B Lassale, A Deburge.   

Abstract

Posterolateral lumbar fusion is commonly recognized to have a significant effect upon the more proximal unfused segments. Wether these effects are clinically significant remains unclear. Long term studies with standardized follow-up are scarce. The purpose of this study was to examine the long term roentgenographic and clinical effects of posterolateral fusion upon the 3 cephalad unfused segments. The levels below a floating fusion were also examined. The factors promoting the occurrence of degenerative changes on standard or dynamic x rays were also investigated with a multivariate analysis model. 102 patients who underwent a posterolateral fusion were retrospectively reviewed with an average follow-up of 8.9 years. 39 patients (group I) were fused for low back pain caused by isthmic lysis spondylolisthesis, 15 (group II) for degenerative disc disease and 48 (group III) in addition to a posterior decompression for a lumbar spinal stenosis. Pre and postoperative standard and dynamic roentgenograms were compared in order to study: evolution of the disc space height, modifications in the angular and antero-posterior mobility, modifications in the antero-posterior displacement of the vertebral bodies. Degenerative changes were frequent. 49 per cent of the patients demonstrated a severe disc space narrowing, 30 per cent developed a degenerative spondylolisthesis, 32 per cent an angular hypermobility and 35 per cent an antero-posterior hypermobility. Only one factor was found to increase significantly the occurrence of degenerative changes: the indication of lumbar fusion. Degenerative changes were significantly more frequent in group III's patients. However, no significant correlation was found between the roentgenographic findings and the final functional results and only 8 patients required a new surgery. These results may suggest that posterolateral fusion accelerates the development of degenerative changes in adjacent discs if the fusion is performed on a degenerative spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9615139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  12 in total

1.  Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Yong Ahn; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Alice Darnis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

3.  In vitro investigation of two connector types for continuous rod construct to extend lumbar spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Dennis Nebel; Nadine Bergmann; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The change of whole lumbar segmental motion according to the mobility of degenerated disc in the lower lumbar spine: a kinetic MRI study.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Scott D Daffner; Jeffrey C Wang; Barry C Davis; Ahmet Alanay; Jung Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.

Authors:  C Tournier; S Aunoble; J C Le Huec; J P Lemaire; P Tropiano; V Lafage; W Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Shun-Wu Fan; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Feng-Dong Zhao; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Elisa C Bass; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Riccardo Sinigaglia; Albert Bundy; Sandro Costantini; Ugo Nena; Francesco Finocchiaro; Daniele A Fabris Monterumici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Additional decompression at adjacent segments leads to adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.

Authors:  Masayuki Miyagi; Osamu Ikeda; Seiji Ohtori; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Yukio Someya; Masataka Shibayama; Yasufumi Ogawa; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Hiroto Kamoda; Gen Arai; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Yasuchika Aoki; Tomoaki Toyone; Toshio Ooi; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of Functional Outcomes Between Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Discectomy in Massive Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Anuj Gupta; H S Chhabra; D Nagarjuna; Mohit Arora
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.