Literature DB >> 9614821

The need for acute, subacute and nonacute care at 105 general hospital sites in Ontario. Joint Policy and Planning Committee Non-Acute Hospitalization Project Working Group.

V F Flintoft1, J I Williams, R C Williams, A S Basinski, P Blackstien-Hirsch, C D Naylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of hospital utilization have not taken into account the use of acute care beds for subacute care. The authors determined the proportion of patients who required acute, subacute and nonacute care on admission and during their hospital stay in general hospitals in Ontario. From this analysis, they identified areas where the efficiency of care delivery might be improved.
METHODS: Ninety-eight of 189 acute care hospitals in Ontario, at 105 sites, participated in a review that used explicit criteria for rating acuity developed by Inter-Qual Inc., Marlborough, Mass. The records of 13,242 patients who were discharged over a 9-month period in 1995 after hospital care for 1 of 8 high-volume, high-variability diagnoses or procedures were randomly selected for review. Patients were categorized on the basis of the level of care (acute, subacute or nonacute) they required on admission and during subsequent days of hospital care.
RESULTS: Of all admissions, 62.2% were acute, 19.7% subacute and 18.1% nonacute. The patients most likely to require acute care on admission were those with acute myocardial infarction (96.2% of 1826 patients) or cerebrovascular accident (84.0% of 1596 patients) and those admitted for elective surgery on the day of their procedure (73.4% of 3993 patients). However, 41.1% of patients awaiting hip or knee replacement were admitted the day before surgery so did not require acute care on admission. The proportion of patients who required acute care on admission and during the subsequent hospital stay declined with age; the proportion of patients needing nonacute care did not vary with age. After admission, acute care was needed on 27.5% of subsequent days, subacute care on 40.2% and nonacute care on 32.3%. The need for acute care on admission was a predictor of need for acute care during subsequent hospital stay among patients with medical conditions. The proportion of patients requiring subacute care during the subsequent hospital stay increased with age, decreased with the number of inpatient beds in each hospital and was highest among patients with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia.
INTERPRETATION: In 1995, inpatients requiring subacute care accounted for a substantial proportion of nonacute care days in Ontario's general hospitals. These findings suggest a need to evaluate the efficiencies that might be achieved by introducing a subacute category of care into the Canadian health care system. Generally, efforts are needed to reduce the proportion of admissions for nonacute care and of in-hospital days for other than acute care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9614821      PMCID: PMC1229322     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  8 in total

1.  Relationship between inappropriate admissions and days of care: implications for utilization management.

Authors:  B M Booth; R L Ludke; D S Wakefield; D C Kern; C E du Mond
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1991

2.  Reducing unnecessary care: different approaches to the "big ticket" and the "little ticket" items.

Authors:  R W Dubois
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  1991-10

3.  Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review.

Authors:  C DeCoster; N P Roos; K C Carrière; S Peterson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Appropriateness of short-stay admissions for procedures in six Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Authors:  R N Winickoff; M A Fischer; B J August
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1991-12

5.  Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria.

Authors:  I Strumwasser; N V Paranjpe; D L Ronis; D Share; L J Sell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care.

Authors:  P M Gertman; J D Restuccia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Subacute care: the future of health care.

Authors:  D A Stahl
Journal:  Nurs Manage       Date:  1994-10

8.  Impact of a mandatory Medicaid case management program on prenatal care and birth outcomes. A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  N I Goldfarb; A L Hillman; J M Eisenberg; M A Kelley; A V Cohen; M Dellheim
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Utilization review: can it be improved?

Authors:  J V Tu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Discharges against medical advice: time to address the causes.

Authors:  Richard Saitz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prospective study of barriers to discharge from a spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  P W New
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Emotional Consequences of Delays in Spinal Rehabilitation Unit Admission or Discharge: A Qualitative Study on the Importance of Communication.

Authors:  Narelle Warren; Karin Walford; Annisha Susilo; Peter Wayne New
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-27

5.  Determining level of care appropriateness in the patient journey from acute care to rehabilitation.

Authors:  Christopher J Poulos; Christopher Magee; Guy Bashford; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Time-series analysis of the barriers for admission into a spinal rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  P W New; M Akram
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Factors associated with patients who leave acute-care hospitals against medical advice.

Authors:  Said A Ibrahim; C Kent Kwoh; Eswar Krishnan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Acute care alternate-level-of-care days due to delayed discharge for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injuries.

Authors:  Chen Amy; Brandon Zagorski; Vincy Chan; Daria Parsons; Rika Vander Laan; Angela Colantonio
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-05

9.  A qualitative examination of inappropriate hospital admissions and lengths of stay.

Authors:  Christina L Hammond; Lorraine L Pinnington; Margaret F Phillips
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review?

Authors:  Christopher J Poulos; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.