SETTING: A laboratory for routine culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of an episode of laboratory cross contamination using IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing. Improvement of laboratory protocols to prevent contaminations in the future. To stress the importance of 'good laboratory practice', and interaction with clinicians about laboratory results. DESIGN: Fingerprinting of mycobacterial isolates from 1) cultures suspected of being contaminated and 2) strains suspected of being the source of the cross-contamination. RESULTS: RFLP typing results indicated that clinical samples were contaminated by strains which had been processed in species identification procedures one day earlier in the same safety cabinet. This cross contamination also resulted in exceptional RFLP typing results--mixed banding patterns. Three patients were treated on the basis of false-positive laboratory results. Because the laboratory results were confusing for the clinicians, the treatment of one true tuberculosis patient was severely delayed. CONCLUSION: 'Good laboratory practice' is very important to prevent cross contamination. RFLP typing proved to be a useful tool to trace the source of contamination. Interaction with clinicians receiving doubtful results is of the utmost importance.
SETTING: A laboratory for routine culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of an episode of laboratory cross contamination using IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing. Improvement of laboratory protocols to prevent contaminations in the future. To stress the importance of 'good laboratory practice', and interaction with clinicians about laboratory results. DESIGN: Fingerprinting of mycobacterial isolates from 1) cultures suspected of being contaminated and 2) strains suspected of being the source of the cross-contamination. RESULTS: RFLP typing results indicated that clinical samples were contaminated by strains which had been processed in species identification procedures one day earlier in the same safety cabinet. This cross contamination also resulted in exceptional RFLP typing results--mixed banding patterns. Three patients were treated on the basis of false-positive laboratory results. Because the laboratory results were confusing for the clinicians, the treatment of one true tuberculosis patient was severely delayed. CONCLUSION: 'Good laboratory practice' is very important to prevent cross contamination. RFLP typing proved to be a useful tool to trace the source of contamination. Interaction with clinicians receiving doubtful results is of the utmost importance.
Authors: Annette S de Boer; Barbara Blommerde; Petra E W de Haas; Maruschka M G G Sebek; Kitty S B Lambregts-van Weezenbeek; Mirjam Dessens; Dick van Soolingen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: David A J Moore; Luz Caviedes; Robert H Gilman; Jorge Coronel; Fanny Arenas; Doris LaChira; Cayo Salazar; Juan Carlos Saravia; Richard A Oberhelman; Maria-Graciela Hollm-Delgado; A Roderick Escombe; Carlton A W Evans; Jon S Friedland Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2006-05-06 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Robert M Jasmer; Marguerite Roemer; John Hamilton; John Bunter; Christopher R Braden; Thomas M Shinnick; Edward P Desmond Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: El Mehdi Bentaleb; Mohammed Abid; My Driss El Messaoudi; Brahim Lakssir; El Mostafa Ressami; Saaïd Amzazi; Hassan Sefrioui; Hassan Ait Benhassou Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 3.090