Literature DB >> 12409366

False-positive mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures in 44 laboratories in The Netherlands (1993 to 2000): incidence, risk factors, and consequences.

Annette S de Boer1, Barbara Blommerde, Petra E W de Haas, Maruschka M G G Sebek, Kitty S B Lambregts-van Weezenbeek, Mirjam Dessens, Dick van Soolingen.   

Abstract

False-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures are a benchmark for the quality of laboratory processes and patient care. We studied the incidence of false-positive cultures, risk factors, and consequences for patients during the period from 1993 to 2000 in 44 peripheral laboratories in The Netherlands. The national reference laboratory tested 8,889 M. tuberculosis isolates submitted by these laboratories. By definition, a culture was false positive (i) if the DNA fingerprint of the isolate was identical to that of an isolate from another patient processed within 7 days in the same laboratory, (ii) if the isolate was taken from a patient without clinical signs of tuberculosis, and/or (iii) if the false-positive test result was confirmed by the peripheral laboratory and/or the public health tuberculosis officer. We identified 213 false-positive cultures (2.4%). The overall incidence of false-positive cultures decreased over the years, from 3.9% in 1993 to 1.1% in 2000. Laboratories with false-positive cultures more often processed less than 3,000 samples per year (P < 0.05). Among 110 patients for whom a false-positive culture was identified from 1995 to 1999, we found that for 36% of the patients an official tuberculosis notification had been provided to the appropriate public health services, 31% of the patients were treated, 14% of the patients were hospitalized, and a contact investigation had been initiated for 16% of the patients. The application of DNA fingerprinting to identify false-positive M. tuberculosis cultures and the provision of feedback to peripheral laboratories are useful instruments to improve the quality of laboratory processes and the quality of medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12409366      PMCID: PMC139647          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4004-4009.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  25 in total

1.  Transmission of a highly drug-resistant strain (strain W1) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Community outbreak and nosocomial transmission via a contaminated bronchoscope.

Authors:  T Agerton; S Valway; B Gore; C Pozsik; B Plikaytis; C Woodley; I Onorato
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Frequency and type of reactions to antituberculosis drugs: observations in routine treatment.

Authors:  L P Ormerod; N Horsfield
Journal:  Tuber Lung Dis       Date:  1996-02

3.  Utility of molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis.

Authors:  D van Soolingen
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Computer analysis of IS6110 RFLP patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  H F Heersma; K Kremer; J D van Embden
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1998

Review 5.  Review of published cost-effectiveness studies on tuberculosis treatment programmes.

Authors:  R J Fryatt
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  False-positive results from cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis due to laboratory cross-contamination confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  J Bauer; V O Thomsen; S Poulsen; A B Andersen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis specimen contamination revisited: the role of laboratory environmental control in a pseudo-outbreak.

Authors:  S Segal-Maurer; B N Kreiswirth; J M Burns; S Lavie; M Lim; C Urban; J J Rahal
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  The incidence of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  W J Burman; B L Stone; R R Reves; M L Wilson; Z Yang; H El-Hajj; J H Bates; M D Cave
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Misdiagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis possibly due to laboratory-related errors.

Authors:  A T Nitta; P T Davidson; M L de Koning; R J Kilman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Investigation of cross contamination in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory using IS6110 DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  J M Van Duin; J E Pijnenburg; C M van Rijswoud; P E de Haas; W D Hendriks; D van Soolingen
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  14 in total

1.  Criteria for identification of cross-contamination of cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in routine microbiology laboratories.

Authors:  Nora M Carroll; Madalene Richardson; Paul D van Helden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Continued low rates of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Norway.

Authors:  Ulf R Dahle; Per Sandven; Einar Heldal; Dominique A Caugant
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Impact of laboratory cross-contamination on molecular epidemiology studies of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Miguel Martínez; Darío García de Viedma; María Alonso; Sandra Andrés; Emilio Bouza; Teresa Cabezas; Isabel Cabeza; Armando Reyes; Waldo Sánchez-Yebra; Manuel Rodríguez; M Isabel Sánchez; M Cruz Rogado; Rosa Fernández; Teresa Peñafiel; Juan Martínez; Pilar Barroso; M Angeles Lucerna; L Felipe Diez; Carmelo Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Laboratory Cross-Contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandra Barac; Hannah Karimzadeh-Esfahani; Mahya Pourostadi; Mohammad Taghi Rahimi; Ehsan Ahmadpour; Jalil Rashedi; Behroz Mahdavipoor; Hossein Samadi Kafil; Adel Spotin; Kalkidan Hassen Abate; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Mohammad Asgharzadeh
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  The realistic performance achievable with mycobacterial automated culture systems in high and low prevalence settings.

Authors:  Sanne C van Kampen; Richard M Anthony; Paul R Klatser
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  Methodological and Clinical Aspects of the Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Other Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Tomasz Jagielski; Alina Minias; Jakko van Ingen; Nalin Rastogi; Anna Brzostek; Anna Żaczek; Jarosław Dziadek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Infrequent MODS TB culture cross-contamination in a high-burden resource-poor setting.

Authors:  David A J Moore; Luz Caviedes; Robert H Gilman; Jorge Coronel; Fanny Arenas; Doris LaChira; Cayo Salazar; Juan Carlos Saravia; Richard A Oberhelman; Maria-Graciela Hollm-Delgado; A Roderick Escombe; Carlton A W Evans; Jon S Friedland
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 8.  Practice Guidelines for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Betty A Forbes; Geraldine S Hall; Melissa B Miller; Susan M Novak; Marie-Claire Rowlinson; Max Salfinger; Akos Somoskövi; David M Warshauer; Michael L Wilson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Rapid detection of laboratory cross-contamination with Mycobacterium tuberculosis using multispacer sequence typing.

Authors:  Zoheira Djelouadji; Jean Orehek; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Role of subtyping in detecting Salmonella cross contamination in the laboratory.

Authors:  Niall De Lappe; Jean O Connor; Geraldine Doran; Genevieve Devane; Martin Cormican
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.