Literature DB >> 9610551

Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction.

A A Caldamone1, L E Edstrom, M A Koyle, R Rabinowitz, W C Hulbert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients requiring urethral reconstruction but who have a paucity of usable genital tissue present a considerable technical challenge. Herein we report the experience of three centers in the use of buccal mucosa for urethral replacement.
METHODS: From 1991 to 1996, 22 urethral reconstructions were completed using a graft of buccal mucosa. Eighteen of 22 patients had previously failed hypospadias repairs, while three had bulbar urethral stricture and one had penile carcinoma. Grafts were taken from either the inner cheek or the lower lip, and seven were used as a combined graft. Onlay grafts were used in 6 cases and tubularized grafts in 16 cases.
RESULTS: Two patients developed complications at the donor site. Nine of 22 patients had complications of the urethroplasty-two had meatal stenosis, four developed a urethral fistula, and three developed urethral stricture. All complications have been managed successfully to date.
CONCLUSIONS: Buccal mucosa is an excellent source of graft material for urethral replacement in complex urethroplasties. It is readily available, in abundant supply, and has physical properties beneficial to free graft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610551     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration?

Authors:  Ryan P Dorin; Hans G Pohl; Roger E De Filippo; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A new option for the management of urethral trauma: primary reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption with a buccal mucosa transplant.

Authors:  B Stürzebecher; H Schulte-Baukloh; V Brenneke; T Stolze; C Weiss; H H Knispel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study.

Authors:  Atlantida Raya-Rivera; Diego R Esquiliano; James J Yoo; Esther Lopez-Bayghen; Shay Soker; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Buccal mucosa urethroplasty: a 10-year retrospective review of maxillofacial and urological outcomes.

Authors:  J E O'Connell; I M Cullen; C Murphy; H Flood; G J Kearns
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Silk Fibroin Scaffolds for Urologic Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Bryan S Sack; Joshua R Mauney; Carlos R Estrada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Initial experience with lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  Anand Srivastava; A Dutta; D K Jain
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-11-30

7.  Staged buccal mucosa urethroplasty in reoperative hypospadias.

Authors:  R B Nerli; S E Neelagund; Ajay Guntaka; Shivagouda Patil; Siddayya C Hiremath; Sujata M Jali; Ritesh Vernekar; Murigendra B Hiremath
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-04

8.  Single stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for navicular fossa strictures.

Authors:  Puskar Shyam Chowdhury; Prasant Nayak; Sujata Mallick; Srinivasan Gurumurthy; Deepak David; A Mossadeq
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01

9.  Lingual mucosal graft two-stage Bracka technique for redo hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Ahmed Sakr; Ehab Elkady; Mohamed Abdalla; Amr Fawzi; Mostafa Kamel; Esam Desoky; Mohamed Seleem; Mohamed Omran; Ehab Elsayed; Salem Khalil
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.