Literature DB >> 9607630

Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

P J Drew1, M J Kerin, L W Turnbull, M Imrie, P J Carleton, J N Fox, J R Monson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is highly sensitive for the diagnosis of primary breast malignancy. We investigated the clinical application of dedicated dynamic breast MR for routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy.
METHODS: Patients underwent a single dynamic MR of the breast routinely in the period 1 to 2 years following treatment, or earlier if recurrence was suspected. A biopsy was performed if there was suspicion of recurrence on MR.
RESULTS: One hundred and five patients with a median age of 58 years (range 50 to 65 years) were recruited for the study. Sixteen biopsies were performed and nine recurrences were confirmed histologically. Patients not undergoing biopsy have been followed up for a median of 341 days (range 168 to 451 days) following the MR. The sensitivity for clinical examination, mammography, examination combined with mammography, and MRI alone for the detection of recurrent cancer were 89%, 67%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, and the specificity was 76%, 85%, 67%, and 93%.
CONCLUSION: Combined clinical examination and mammography are as sensitive as dedicated dynamic MR of the breast for the detection of locoregional recurrence, but breast MRI is associated with a far greater specificity. Therefore, dedicated dynamic breast MRI should be used when there is clinical or mammographic suspicion of recurrence to confirm or refute its presence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9607630     DOI: 10.1007/bf02303784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

1.  [Clip marker placement following MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast].

Authors:  C Perlet; H Sittek; M Reiser; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Is symptom-oriented follow-up still up to date?

Authors:  Christoph Mundhenke; Volker Moebus
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions.

Authors:  P J Drew; L W Turnbull; S Chatterjee; J Read; P J Carleton; J N Fox; J R Monson; M J Kerin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Yuan Han; XiaoGuang Sun; JianJun Liu; Huang Gang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging.

Authors:  Domenico Albano; Federico Bruno; Andrea Agostini; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Massimo Benenati; Giulia Bicchierai; Michaela Cellina; Vito Chianca; Diletta Cozzi; Ginevra Danti; Federica De Muzio; Letizia Di Meglio; Francesco Gentili; Giuliana Giacobbe; Giulia Grazzini; Irene Grazzini; Pasquale Guerriero; Carmelo Messina; Giuseppe Micci; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Maria Paola Rocco; Roberto Grassi; Vittorio Miele; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Surveillance mammography for detecting ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clare Robertson; Senthil Kumar Arcot Ragupathy; Charles Boachie; Cynthia Fraser; Steve D Heys; Graeme Maclennan; Graham Mowatt; Ruth E Thomas; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Current applications and future direction of MR mammography.

Authors:  P J Kneeshaw; L W Turnbull; P J Drew
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.