Literature DB >> 9607464

Current concepts of ventricular defibrillation.

P S Chen1, C D Swerdlow, C Hwang, H S Karagueuzian.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to review the current concepts of ventricular defibrillation. We studied the interaction between strong electrical stimulus and cardiac responses in both animal models and in humans. We found that a premature stimulus (S2) of appropriate strength results in figure-eight reentry in vitro by inducing propagated graded responses. The same stimulation protocol induces figure-eight reentry and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in vivo. When the S2 strength and the magnitude of graded responses increase beyond a critical level, the increase in refractoriness at the site of the stimulus becomes so long that the unidirectional block becomes bidirectional block, preventing the formation of reentry (upper limit of vulnerability [ULV]). In other studies, we found that the effects of an electrical stimulation on reentry is in part determined by the timing of the stimulus. A protective zone is present after the induction of VF and after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock during which an electrical stimulus can terminate reentry and protect the heart from VF. These results indicate that the effects of a defibrillation shock is dependent on both the strength and the timing of the shock. Timing is not important in areas where the shock field strength is > or = ULV because the shock terminates all reentry but cannot reinitiate new ones. However, in areas where shock field strength is < ULV, the effects of the shock are determined by the timing of the shock relative to local VF activations. This ULV hypothesis of defibrillation explains the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation. It also indicates that, to achieve a high probability of successful defibrillation, a shock must result in a shock field strength of > or = ULV throughout the ventricles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9607464     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb01848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  7 in total

1.  Drawing the curtain on the isoelectric window?

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Single capacitive discharge utilizing an auxiliary shock in the coronary venous system reduces the defibrillation threshold.

Authors:  P R Roberts; Y Zhang; S Zhuan; K A Mowrey; D W Wallick; D G Hills; T R Betts; S Allen; J Ewert; T N Mazgalev; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  A Latin American registry of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the ICD-LABOR study.

Authors:  Sergio Dubner; Elina Valero; Ricardo Pesce; Jorge González Zuelgaray; José C Pachon Mateos; Silas Galvao Filho; Walter Reyes; Raúl Garillo
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  ZP123 reduces energy required for defibrillation by preventing connexin43 remodeling during prolonged ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  Shao-lei Yi; Jing-quan Zhong; Jing Zhang; Guo-ying Su; Jing-sha Li; Hong-zhen Liu; Yun Zhang
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

5.  Comparison of coronary venous defibrillation with conventional transvenous internal defibrillation in man.

Authors:  P R Roberts; J R Paisey; T R Betts; S Allen; T Whitman; M Bonner; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Defibrillation in children.

Authors:  Sarah E Haskell; Dianne L Atkins
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-07

7.  Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; James D Sweeney
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.