Literature DB >> 11752919

Single capacitive discharge utilizing an auxiliary shock in the coronary venous system reduces the defibrillation threshold.

P R Roberts1, Y Zhang, S Zhuan, K A Mowrey, D W Wallick, D G Hills, T R Betts, S Allen, J Ewert, T N Mazgalev, J M Morgan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Auxiliary shocks (AS) from electrodes sutured to the left ventricle (LV) prior to primary biphasic shocks (PS) have been shown to reduce defibrillation thresholds (DFT). Two capacitors are required to generate these waveforms. We investigate delivery of AS from one capacitor using a novel waveform. The epicardial surface of the LV is accessed transvenously via the middle cardiac vein (MCV) avoiding a thoracotomy.
METHODS: A defibrillation electrode was placed in the right ventricle (RV) and superior vena cava (SVC) in 12 pigs (37+/-2 kg). A 50x1.8 mm electrode was inserted in the MCV through a guide catheter. A can was placed in the left pectoral region. A monophasic AS (100 microF, 1.5 J) was delivered along one pathway before switching to deliver a biphasic waveform (40% tilt, 2 ms phase 2) along another. DFTs (PS+AS) were assessed using a binary search. Two configurations not incorporating AS acted as controls. DFTs were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: DFTs of the four novel configurations (AS/PS) were: RV-->Can/MCV-->Can=14.9+/-3.7 J, MCV-->Can/RV-->Can=17.2+/-5.7 J, RV-->SVC+Can/MCV-->SVC+Can=13.4+/-4.6 J, MCV-->SVC+Can/RV-->SVC+Can=17.1+/-5.9 J. Delivering AS in the RV followed by PS in the MCV reduced the DFT (RV-->Can (19.9+/-7.3 J, P<0.01) and RV-->SVC+Can (19.2+/-6.0 J, P<0.05)).
CONCLUSIONS: Delivering AS prior to PS in the MCV reduces the DFT by up to a third compared to conventional configurations of RV-->Can and RV-->SVC+Can. This is possible using only a single capacitor and an entirely transvenous approach to the LV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11752919     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013266600072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  21 in total

1.  The middle cardiac vein--a novel pathway to reduce the defibrillation threshold.

Authors:  P R Roberts; J F Urban; D E Euler; M J Kallok; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Directional variability of stimulation threshold measurements in isolated guinea pig cardiomyocytes: relationship with orthogonal sequential defibrillating pulses.

Authors:  A L Bardou; J M Chesnais; P J Birkui; M C Govaere; P M Auger; D Von Euw; J Degonde
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Influence of electrical axis of stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells.

Authors:  L Tung; N Sliz; M R Mulligan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system.

Authors:  M Usui; R L Callihan; R G Walker; G P Walcott; D L Rollins; P D Wolf; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-04

Review 5.  Current concepts of ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  P S Chen; C D Swerdlow; C Hwang; H S Karagueuzian
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-05

6.  The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity.

Authors:  Y Yamanouchi; Y Cheng; P J Tchou; I R Efimov
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Marked reduction of ventricular defibrillation threshold by application of an auxiliary shock to a catheter electrode in the left posterior coronary vein of dogs.

Authors:  B H Kenknight; R G Walker; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-08

8.  Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M S Chang; H Inoue; M J Kallok; D P Zipes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Transseptal defibrillation is superior for transvenous defibrillation.

Authors:  I Singer; J Goldsmith; C Maldonado
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Sequential pulse countershock between two transvenous catheters: feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

Authors:  R Yee; D L Jones; G J Klein; A D Sharma; M J Kallok
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  1 in total

1.  Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; James D Sweeney
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.